MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2614562262 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.1211.1211

Prognostic Significance of 11q23/MLL Fusion Partners in Children with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) - Results from the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Trial AAML0531

2016· article· en· W2614562262 sur OpenAlexaff
Erin Guest, Betsy Hirsch, E. Anders Kolb, Todd A. Alonzo, Robert B. Gerbing, Richard Aplenc, Jessica A. Pollard, Lillian Sung, Soheil Meshinchi, Alan S. Gamis, Susana C. Raimondi

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInternal medicineMedicineMonosomyOncologyGemtuzumab ozogamicinMyeloid leukemiaLeukemiaPediatricsBiologyChromosomeGeneticsCD33

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Rearrangement of chromosome 11q23 at KMT2A (MLL+) occurs in ~20% of childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases and is the most common recurrent cytogenetic abnormality in childhood AML. More than 80 fusion partners of MLL have been characterized and the prognostic impact varies by partner and additional cytogenetic aberrations (ACAs). We previously reported superior event-free-survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), relapse risk (RR) and disease free survival (DFS) for patients with MLL+ on AAML0531 treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). The impact of fusion partners has not been described for this trial cohort. Objective: To determine the impact of 11q23/MLL+ fusion partners on outcomes for children with AML who were treated uniformly on AAML0531. Methods: AAML0531 (2006 - 2010) was a randomized phase 3 trial of GO with conventional chemotherapy for children, adolescents, and young adults, ages 0 to 29 years, with de novo AML. The trial enrolled 1022 eligible patients without Down syndrome, and cytogenetic data was available for 988 patients. Of those, 215 (21.8%) were classified as 11q23/MLL+ after central cytogenetic review. The majority of patients with 11q23/MLL+ AML (n=200, 93%) were classified as intermediate risk (IR) and a minority (n=15, 7%) were classified as high risk (HR) based upon high FLT3 internal tandem duplication allelic ratio (FLT3-ITD-AR), monosomy 5/5q deletion, monosomy 7, or >15% blasts by morphology following Induction (Ind) I. HSCT was performed for 30 patients (14%). We defined 11q23/MLL+ subgroups for partners identified in ≥5 cases. Partners in <5 cases were grouped as "other"; unidentified fusions were classified as "unknown". Outcomes of minimal residual disease (MRD) at end of Ind I and complete remission (CR) at end of Ind II, 5-yr EFS and OS from study entry, and 5-yr RR from end of Ind II for patients in CR were compared across subgroups. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. Results: The median age for the 11q23/MLL+ cohort was 2.5 years and the distribution was equally male and female. The majority of cases (n=175, 81%) were classified into 8 specific partner subgroups, and the remaining cases were classified as other (n=30, 14%) or unknown (n=10, 5%). The most common translocation was t(9;11)(p22;q23) (n= 82, 38%). Central nervous system involvement was rare (<10% overall and in every subgroup). While extramedullary chloromas were rare (7% overall), chloromas were reported in 83% (n=5) of t(10;11)(p11.2;q23), 40% (n=16) of t(10;11)(p12;q23), and 27% (n=4) of t(6;11)(q27;q23). ACAs were observed in 86 of 211 cases (41%) that underwent central review. ACAs were numerical in 54 cases (26%), most commonly trisomy 8 (n=30, 14%) and structural + numerical in 32 cases (15%), most commonly involving chromosome 1 (n=11, 34%). Molecular findings for 3 studied genes were rare: High FLT3-ITD-AR n=4; NPM1 n=1; CEBPA n=0. Clinical outcomes varied significantly by fusion partner and poorer OS was primarily due to relapse (Table 1). CR rate was 86% overall and did not vary by subgroups. MRD was detected in 21% overall and was most common in t(1;11)(q21;q23) and t(6;11)(q27;q23). Complex karyotype (≥3 abnormalities) was seen in 52 cases (25%) and predicted inferior outcome compared to <3 abnormalities (5-yr EFS 29% vs. 41%, p=0.02; 5-yr OS 44% vs. 63%, p=0.001, respectively). Chromosome 1 abnormalities were associated with very poor outcomes, 5-yr EFS 19% and 5-yr OS 29%. The most unfavorable partners for EFS were t(6;11)(q27;q23), t(10;11)(p11.2;q23), t(10;11)(p12;q23), and t(11;19)(q23;p13.3)(Figure 1). In multivariable comparison to patients with t(9;11)(p22;q23), the former 3 groups maintained inferior EFS (HR 2.51, p=0.006; HR 3.10, p<0.001; HR 2.15, p=0.002, respectively) and OS (HR 2.56, p=0.017; HR 4.8, p=0.006; HR 2.14, p=0.016, respectively). Conclusions: Fusion partners critically impact the prognosis of 11q23/MLL+ AML. In this large, uniformly treated cohort, t(6;11)(q27;q23), t(10;11)(p11.2;q23) and t(10;11)(p12;q23) were independently associated with inferior EFS and OS. Children with these unfavorable partners are at high risk for relapse and allogeneic HSCT should be considered in first CR. Complex karyotype, chromosome 1 aberrations, and extramedullary chloromas were additional adverse prognostic factors. Work is ongoing to confirm these results in the subsequent COG trial, AAML1031. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,286
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations17
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207