MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2615867832

The Development of Absolute Pitch: The Early Training Theory

2014· article· en· W2615867832 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dorina Geta Iuşcă

Notice bibliographique

RevueReview of Artistic Education · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDiverse Music Education Insights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRelative pitchAbsolute pitchMusicalPitch (Music)Tone (literature)Musical toneSpeech recognitionIntonation (linguistics)PsychologySemitoneComputer scienceLinguisticsCommunicationMathematicsPerceptionPhilosophyArtLiterature
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

1. IntroductionAbsolute pitch is a distinct cognitive ability possessed a minority of musicians, that refers to the unique capacity of recognizing and naming the pitch of given sounds without the use of an external reference pitch (Takeuchi & Hulse, 1993; Bermudez & Zatorre, 2009; Miyazaki & Ogawa, 2006; Deutsch et al, 2006; Baharloo et al, 1998; Gregersen et al, 1999; Brown et al, 2003; Pamcutt & Levitin, 1999; Deutsch, 2002; Levitin & Zatorre, 2003). Other definitions indicate the idea of quickly and accurately labeling tonal stimuli on the basis of their fundamental frequencies (without the use of a reference tone) (Ross et al, 2004, p. 1793).When discussing pitch, it is important to differentiate it from the relative pitch. This is why some definitions of pitch need to include this aspect: absolute pitch is the rare ability to name a music tone correctly without comparison to one (Cohen & Baird, 1990, p. 31). Relative pitch refers to the ability to recognize the relationships between musical notes. A person relying on relative pitch will name certain tones only if given a reference musical note and calculating the pitch ratios between the reference note and the new one. A musician with pitch will perceive and name the notes individually, without relating them to one another. The ability to judge one note in relation to another (relative pitch) is a basic musical skill intended to be acquired most of the music education programs. Excellent relative pitch is common among musicians, can be developed through ear training exercises and is very important in musical practice.Another essential facet of pitch is its automatic character. Those who have pitch claim that identifying pitches is effortless and immediate and that they make no special effort or conscious strategy in naming the tones Some authors (Pamcutt & Levitin, 1999) even suggest a shortcoming associated to pitch. Referring to people with pitch, the two Canadian researchers imply that their constant awareness of musical pitch labels can detract from their enjoyment of music. Many times musicians with pitch may complain: don't hear melodies, I hear pitch names passing by (Pamcutt & Levitin, 1999, p. 12). The capacity to name notes with a minimum of deliberation and in a very short time is often used in unraveling real pitch owners from musicians with very good relative pitch who sometimes memorize the frequency of one or two musical notes.2. Prevalence of pitchThe proportion of pitch possessors is roughly estimated to be less than one to 1500 or even one to 10000 in the general population (Miyazaki & Ogawa, 2006). Among musicians, the estimated proportion of pitch possessors varies from 3.4% to about 15%, or sometimes to 40% (Miyazaki & Ogawa, 2006; Pamcutt & Levitin, 1999). Gregersen and collaborators (Gregersen et al, 1999) observed large variations in pitch prevalence among music student populations: conservatory (24.6%), university-based school of music (7.3%), or liberal arts/state university music program (4.7%).Absolute pitch is more prevalent among blind musicians, with a proportion of 57% (Hamilton et al, 2004). The finding was interpreted as a result of specific neurological features related to the increased variability of planum temporale asymmetry among blind pitch musicians. The notion that cross-modal plasticity involving the occipital cortex may provide an additional neural substrate for the development of pitch in the blind is an intriguing hypothesis that merits further investigation.Another interesting aspect about pitch is its curiously high prevalence among Asian musicians. The fact has been explained in various ways. Gregersen and his colleagues (Gregersen et al, 1999) found a significant correlation between pitch and the age at which and individual first began playing music. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,961
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,914

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,064
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueReview of Artistic EducationMême sujetDiverse Music Education InsightsTravaux en français237 207