PS-098 Reorganisation of medication circuit in the operating and delivery room
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
<h3>Background</h3> Pharmacy practice is highly regulated and the medication circuit is complex in healthcare settings. Required organisational practices of the national accreditation authority also provide a normative framework. <h3>Purpose</h3> To describe the reorganisation of the medication circuit in the operating (OR) and delivery (DR) room. <h3>Material and methods</h3> A prospective descriptive study was conducted in OR and DR in a 500 bed teaching hospital. Following a review of literature, an Ishikawa diagram was developed to identify failure modes. Thereafter, a semi-structured direct observation in OR and DR was done to identify key issues. Corrective measures were discussed and adopted by consensus with a multidisciplinary group, including pharmacists, anaesthesiologists, nurses and respiratory therapists. <h3>Results</h3> 10 failure modes associated with the medication circuit and 18 key issues were identified. A total of 30 corrective measures were proposed. While all inpatient care areas have designated pharmacists to provide decentralised pharmaceutical care in the hospital, the OR and DR have none. Pharmacists were identified to share such coverage within their current intensive care and surgical care daily duties. Automated dispensing cabinets were implemented to better control drug dispensing and stock replenishing for each room. A safe anaesthesia box system was chosen and the drug content standardised with a detailed record sheet, improving the management and the documentation of prepared and administered doses, including residual quantities at the end of a shift. The system was pre-tested and improved before implementation. A radio-identification based system was also developed to manage RFID labels and anaesthesia box replenishing steps within the central pharmacy. A monitoring system was chosen to monitor cold chain of drugs stored in refrigerators. Expiration dates were reviewed according to current standards to minimise risks of contamination. Drug utilisation reviews were identified for drug targets to offer feedback to drug prescribers. <h3>Conclusion</h3> OR and DR are often less supported by pharmacy to insure an optimal medication circuit. With a view to ensuring continuous improvement of quality of patient care, audits should be performed to measure the impact of corrective actions implemented. <h3>References and/or acknowledgements</h3> Thanks to pharmacists and medical and paramedical staffs for their collaboration. No conflict of interest
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle