Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Principles of Engineering Service-Oriented Systems
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This volume contains the proceedings of the Third Workshop on Principles of Engineering Service-Oriented Systems (PESOS 2011), held in Hawaii, USA on May 23rd and 24th 2011, co-located with ICSE 2011. PESOS is one of the satellite workshops of ICSE that provides a lively and exciting environment for discussion of trends in all aspects of computing that are related to Software Engineering. PESOS 2011 follows the steps of its two predecessors, held in Vancouver (2009) and Cape Town (2010), and aims at exploring the engineering aspects of service-oriented systems. These systems represent a class of software systems in which software is viewed and used as external, loosely-coupled services rather than being physically integrated and owned permanently. Service-oriented systems provide a flexible approach to software development, provisioning, and maintenance because services offer reusable functionality that can be combined to support business processes (or similar) that are dynamic in nature. This enables systems to adapt to changes in their environment as well as to the continuously evolving requirements that are commonplace today. However, service orientation poses challenges to more traditional approaches to software development, stemming from the lack of homogeneity of its basic components and from the requirement to accommodate changes and evolution right from the beginning. The goal of this workshop is to find possibilities of synergy between Software Engineering and Service-Oriented Computing that are beneficial to both fields. In organizing this workshop, we sought to bring together practitioners from both communities for a fruitful exchange of opinions, expertise and experiences. PESOS 2011 was fortunate to have invited talks from experts in the field and a panel on the future of research in service-oriented systems engineering. In addition, nine out of nineteen submitted papers were selected for presentation in four technical sessions. We want to thank the program committee and the additional reviewers for their dedication and the excellent work performed, without which the workshop would not have been possible. We also want to extend our gratitude to the organizers of ICSE 2011 for the facilities they gave us regarding the logistics of the workshop and the publication of the proceedings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».