GPS/INS Integration Based on Recursive Least Square Lattice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The integration of both the Global Positioning System (GPS) and Inertial Navigation System (INS) has several navigation and positioning applications. Both systems have their unique features and shortcomings. Therefore, their integration offers robust navigation solution. This paper introduces a novel multi-sensor system integration using Recursive Least Square Lattice (RLSL) filter. The proposed system has a similar structure to the widely used Kalman filter. However, it has the major advantage of working without the need of neither dynamic nor stochastic models. Furthermore, no prior information about the covariance information of INS and GPS is required. The RLSL process includes both the lattice predictor and the joint process estimator. The lattice predictor has a modular structure, which consists of a number of individual stages. Each stage has the appearance of a lattice. This lattice structure allows the simultaneous implementation of one forward and one backward prediction error filters. The forward prediction error is the difference between the input (e.g. INS velocity) and its one-step forward prediction value, which is obtained using a number of past tap inputs equivalent to the filter order. Similarly, the backward prediction error is the difference between the last tap input to the filter and its backward prediction value, which is based on the following tap inputs to the filter. The final forward and backward prediction errors can be determined by moving stage by stage through the lattice predictor. In this study, loosely coupled GPS/INS architecture is adopted and only GPS velocity updates are used. The INS input signal represented by the input sequence has a direct relationship with backward prediction errors. This allows estimating some desired response from a linear combination of the backward prediction errors. The backward prediction errors are uncorrelated and orthogonal random variables, with a diagonal correlation matrix. Therefore, the desired signal (corresponding to the GPS velocity) contained in the input sequence can be estimated throughout the joint process estimator from the backward prediction errors whose tap weights are the regression coefficients, similar to Kalman gain. These regression coefficients are tuned recursively in the update mode utilizing the GPS velocity components. The performance of the proposed RLSL module for GPS/INS integration is examined with a tactical grade system through a field test. The field test was conducted in Calgary (Alberta, Canada) in a land vehicle involving a NovAtel OEM4 GPS receiver and a tactical grade INS system (the Honeywell HG1700). The proposed system is examined during the availability of the GPS signal and with intentionally introduced GPS signal outages. The results indicate that the proposed RLSL system is indeed robust in providing reliable modeless INS/GPS integration module.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».