MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2618227534 · doi:10.5430/jnep.v7n10p129

“I was scared about just the whole thing... it made me feel better.” The effect of unit tours on pediatric patients in the perioperative setting

2017· article· en· W2618227534 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lynda J. Dimitroff, Lynn Nichols

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePediatric Pain Management Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesAmerican Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses
Mots-clésPerioperativeMedicineAnxietyQualitative researchNursingFamily medicinePsychiatrySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Objective: Anxiety is a major issue for surgical patients during the perianesthesia period, especially pediatric patients and their families. The surgical experience can be extremely stressful to children and their caregivers. Offering preoperative tours to children and their families may increase their sense of control and positively affect their overall perioperative experience. The purpose of the research was to explore the effect of unit tours on pediatric patients in the perioperative setting. The research question for this study was: What is the effect of unit tours on pediatric patients in the perioperative setting? The tours implemented during the study were designed and conducted specifically for this study.Methods: Naturalistic inquiry and descriptive qualitative were used in this study. The sample included 33 children, 7-11 years old (y.o.) who were scheduled for otolaryngological and urological surgeries (minor procedures) through the Ambulatory Surgery Center at a 528-bed acute-care facility in western New York, and their parents. The sample size of 33 children was appropriate for this qualitative study. Children excluded from the study were those: who had not participated in a tour prior to surgery; whose surgery was canceled on DOS; who were medicated prior to the interview; who had an unplanned hospital admission; and children with a medical history that would impact normal developmental stages. The primary investigator collected all of the data and was mentored through the process in a nursing research fellowship program by the director of the Department of Nursing Research. Data were collected through interviews with children, open-ended questionnaires with parents, participant observation, and record review of patient clinical data. Data from interviews and questionnaires were analyzed using constant-comparative analysis to identify emergent themes. Participant observations and clinical data were utilized in the overall analysis.Results: Four themes were identified - two from the children’s interviews and two from the parents’ interviews including: Child Theme I - The children thought that the tours were very beneficial; Child Theme II - The tours provided the children with feelings of control during a stressful event; Parent Theme III - Parents believed the tours were an informative experience; and, Parent Theme IV - Parents appreciated having their questions and concerns addressed prior to surgery as well as having the opportunity to become familiar with the environment prior to their child’s surgery.Conclusions: The perioperative tours had a positive impact on anxiety and provided an understanding of the upcoming surgical experience for both the children and their parents. The tours allayed fears about the surgery, made the children feel more comfortable about the impending surgery, provided an opportunity to ask questions, and, familiarized families with the operative surgical environment. The results of this study suggest the importance of unit tours for pediatric patients and their parents. The results contribute to the limited research in the current professional literature.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,015

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,413
Écart entre enseignants0,370 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice→Même sujetPediatric Pain Management Techniques→Travaux en français237 207→