MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2618634991

An evaluation of the educational media programs in Seventh-Day Adventist academies

2015· article· en· W2618634991 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Robert L. Davidson

Notice bibliographique

RevueK-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University) · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesYork UniversityUniversity of Oklahoma
Mots-clésSeventh day adventistMathematics educationPolitical sciencePedagogyComputer scienceSociologyPsychologyTheologyPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Per Cent of Schools Walch were in the Below Average, Average, and ,\bove Average Ranges of Media Program Criteria on Program Items IncludGd within the Aspect of School System Media Services ^ II.Per Cent of Schools IThich were in the Felow Average, Average, and Above Average Ranges of Media Program Criteria on Program Items Included within the Aspect of Media Services for Curriculum and Instruction H III.. Per Cent of Schools which were in the Below Average, Average, and Above Average Ranges of Media Program Criteria on Program Items Included within the Aspect of Educational Media Center. . .13 IV.. Per Gent of Schools Which were in the Below Average, Average, and Above Average Ranges of Media Program Criteria on Program Itema Included within the Aspect of Physical Facilities for Educational Media 17 V.Per Cent of Schools l.-fhich were in the Below Average, Average, and Above Average Ranges of Media Program Criteria on Program Items Included vrithin the Aspect of Budget and Finance cf the Media Program 19 VI.Per Cent of Schools Which were in the Below Average, Average, and Above Average Ranges of Media Program Criteria on Program Item?Included within the Aspect of Educational Madid Staff > 21 THE PROBi.El-4 In all ages there has been a great need to keep "up in all areas of the educational program.To do this a constant evaluat5.on of the program has teen necessary.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current status of the educational media programs of the Seventh-day Adventist academies in the United States and to reccranend areas for improvement.Importance of th^Study .The, study was conducted to see how the academies rate in their educational media programs when evaluated by a standard checklist.The evaluation vas built around six major aspects cf educational media programs as stressed in Fulton's study: (1) School System Educational Media Services, (2) Educational Media Services for Curriculum and Instruction, (3) The Educational Media Center, (4.) Physical Facilities for Educational Media, (5) Budget and Finance of the Mucational Media Program, and (6) Educa- tional Media Staff .1 Though funds are limited,, the Seventh-day Adventist academies must keep pace vith changing times.Tne findings of this study should provide a basis for actions which could be taken at Conference, Union, and General Conference levels to improve the educational media programs of Seventh-day Adventistacademies .Tne use of the checklist by each school administrator should have made him aware of the educational media program in his own school.The purpose of this study will have been m.et if one student receives better instruction as a result of this evaluation.William R.. Fulton."Self-Evaluative Checklist and Criteria for Evaluating Educational Media Programs,."Unpublished research report, University of Oklahoma,.19C-6.. DKFDilTICX CF TERKS Edu cationa ] media refers to all insti^jctional materials and equipment necessary for teaching and lonrning, excluding books.fitlucatlpnql rredla services includes the total efforts to help teachers and students use available educational ruedia.Educational ir.adia prop-am refers to all efforts of a school system to provide educational nedia and services.Educational media director refers to the administrator of the educational media program for the entire school syste-.. Edu cational ?edj.a coord inatcr refers to the supervisor of educational media programs in a secondary school., Frcfesrional educational Ked_ijj_ staf £ i^f-'fers to all certified school personnel v;ho have special prepara'cion for media work and who are engaged in media activities.' ' Clerical media staff refers to personnel such as filing clerks and eecretaries who work full-time in educational media services.Technical media staff includes repairmen, technicians, photographers., and materials processors who work full-time in educational media services.Academies refers to the boarding and day high schools in the United Statfjs which are owned and operated by the Seventh-day Adventist Church.General Conferenc e of Seventh-day Adventist refers to the highest authority of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, Union Conference refers to the third highest authority under the General Conference.State Conference refers to the next division of authority under the Union Gonfere\:ce?'.^'X^Jj^-x.Ms.l refers to maV:ing judgments based on established criteria, Self-eyalu-ition refers to adninistrators evaluating their own school by established criteria.GEMExRy:.RF,SEARCH PRCCEDURBS The proceduie for studying the problem involved two major steps: (1) evaluating the current status and functions of the educational media programs in the academies of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and (2) formulating recommendations for the improvement of the educational pjedia programs of the Seventh-day Adventist academics which appeared to be weak in relation to estab- lished standards, Fulton's Evaluative Checldist v;as used to colloot data from the acadenaes.-^The data were collected during the 1966-67 school yecr.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,064

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,022
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,293
Tête enseignante GPT0,363
Écart entre enseignants0,070 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueK-State Research Exchange (Kansas State University)Même sujetHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityTravaux en français237 207