MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2618739167 · doi:10.11159/htff17.115

A Study on Numerical Analysis of Smoke Protection Characteristicusing Air Curtain in 2nd Floor Building

2017· article· en· W2618739167 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Su-Gak Lee, Jung-Yup Kim, Seung-Won Jeon

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesKorea Institute of Construction TechnologyMinistry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
Mots-clésSmokeEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceArchitectural engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringWaste management

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Recently buildings tend to be taller and larger, they are more vulnerable to fire from a fire safety and firefighting capability point of view.In particular, such buildings with a large space could be a smoke spread route during the fire, so that it becomes more difficult to create a fire compartmentation which is one of the important smoke control design concept.Consequentially, it leads to difficulties in smoke control caused by temperature, external wind pressure, building structure and internal air flow.When we consider the constant fire growth characteristics in fuel-dominant fire in a building with the large space that accommodates the large number of person, a lot of smokes are generated, so that suffocation due to smoke inhalation could lead to loss of lives.Therefore, it has been pointed out that proper smoke control system is needed to deal with the fire in a large space.The solutions that are able to deal with smoke control and isolation so far might include mechanical smoke eliminating, air supply & exhaust control, air injection, whirlwind technology, fluid bag technology, smoke protection screen, air curtain, smoke temperature lowering technology and water screen technology.Among them, it has been noticed that air curtain technology has not been well studied.Klaus and Horn [1] studied on prevention of the smoke spread from the large space to the surrounding space by use of air curtain, and the smoke isolation effect in channel structure depending on air injection speed was investigated by Stein [2].Wilkinson [3] conducted the study on smoke spread prevention performance and major design factors for fire smoke rises along the stair, using scale model test and numerical analysis.The performance of air curtain on smoke isolation is evaluated by adjusting the heat source.Smoke spread behavior and the performance of air curtain on prevention of smoke spread was investigated in the escalator structure between floors.ANSYS CFX [4] is chosen as solver which accuracy and feasibility have been proven and is used widely for flow analysis.The dimension of central plaza of the building was 10×10×2.5 m, and the length, width and height of the corridor divided into 4 ways were 6×2×2.5m.The plaza and corridor on 2 nd floor has a same structure as the 1 st floor, where floors are linked with escalator.Air curtain for smoke isolation, comprising of air supply nozzle (inlet) and exhaust hood (outlet), was equipped in front of escalator on 2 nd floor in order to analyze the smoke protection characteristics against the smoke from the 1 st floor.The width of air supply nozzle of air curtain, injection speed , the width of exhaust hood and exhaust speed are respectively 0.01m, 30 m/s, 0.3m and 1 m/s.Here, air supply and exhaust flow were set equally (Q in = Q out ).The end of corridor except for the side to escalator was set as opening, initial indoor temperature was given as 20℃.The fire source sized 1x1m was located at the center of the plaza on the 1 st floor and numerical analysis was performed with three caloric values of fire, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 MW.Computational domain comprises of 8,100,000 hexa-grids as lattice structure.Denser lattice was generated near the air curtain due to severe flow change.Results show smoke behavior with different three condition depending caloric value, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 MW.Smoke spread was completely isolated by air curtain and the temperature at the center and corridor on the 2 nd floor remained the same as given initial condition in case of caloric value of 0.5 MW, whereas small amount of smoke were penetrated under the air curtain and spread uniformly all over the 2 nd floor, the smoke was gathered on ceiling in case of 1.0 MW.In case of 1.5 MW, more smoke was gathered on ceiling of escalator, resulting in penetration of considerable amount of smoke over the air curtain.Also it was observed that the part of smoke was uniformly spread over the 2 nd floor.Simulation results also shows an ascending air current in connection of floors.Air current reflected from air curtain travels down to exhaust hood at a right angle in case of 0.5 MW, while air current reflected from air curtain is inclined toward a hall in

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,317
Écart entre enseignants0,287 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringMême sujetEducation, Safety, and Science StudiesTravaux en français237 207