Emergence of five physical activity profiles among active children
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Physical activity (PA) behaviour is a general construct that comprises a variety of dimensions (e.g., organised sports, exercise, free play, active transportation). Children reporting similar PA levels may therefore exhibit diverse profiles of PA dimensions as well as different motivational regulation and basic psychological needs. In this qualitative study, different PA profiles were identified and explored among active children, defined as those consistently engaging in ≥ 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA per day. A purposeful sample of active children [ N =25; mean age=12.2 (0.6) years; 48% female] enrolled in the Monitoring Activities of Teenagers to Comprehend their Habits (MATCH) cohort study (Belanger et al., 2013) were interviewed to explore their experience with PA as well as their psychological needs and motivation for PA. Data were transcribed verbatim and coded independently by three researchers. Five distinct PA profiles were identified: specialists, regulars, explorers, outdoor enthusiasts, and accidentally actives. In a cross-profile analysis, preferred types of PA, commitment towards various types of PA, variety in types of PA practiced, and contexts in which PA is practiced (e.g., individual vs group, organised vs unstructured, competitive vs recreational) were themes that distinguished the profiles. Participants in these profiles were also distinguishable based on motivation for PA and basic psychological need satisfaction of competence, autonomy, and relatedness. Taken together, the current findings suggest that active children present different PA profiles and demonstrate the value in drawing on self-determination theory and youth sport development frameworks to help better understand PA experiences in childhood. Considering that PA levels decrease with age, recognising distinct PA profiles and their associated characteristics may help tailor interventions to these PA profiles, and in turn help children maintain PA participation. Acknowledgments: The MATCH study is supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and Sport Canada through the joint Sport Participation Research Initiative and by the New Brunswick Health Research Foundation. Julie Goguen Carpenter was funded through a Joseph-Armand Bombardier Master's degree Award from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Tanya Scarapicchia is currently funded by the Fonds de recherche sante du Quebec (FRSQ). Jennifer Brunet is supported by a Canadian Cancer Society Career Development Award in Prevention.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».