MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W261988860

Strategic Semantics: Word Choice Essentials in Establishing a High-Performance Culture

2014· article· en· W261988860 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephanie Newport, Roscoe B. Shain

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of organizational culture, communication and conflict · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueInformation and Cyber Security
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAccountabilityObligationArgument (complex analysis)NothingCollective responsibilityPsychologyPublic relationsLawPolitical scienceSociologySocial psychologyMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTIONBullying is not a new phenomenon and it has spawned numerous studies on schoolyard bullies both on the playground and in cyberspace (Swartz, 2005). An extreme case in 1992, a student in Indiana was bullied by classmates over a boy; she was tortured and burned alive (Lohr, 2008). Suicide is another, unfortunately common, response to bullying. A young Canadian soldier committed suicide in 2011, saying in his suicide note that he couldn't take the pain any longer (www.foxnews.com/world/2012/09/06). A similar case was that of an 18-year-old student who likewise committed suicide when the bullying became intolerable and authorities did nothing to hold the bullies accountable (drphil.com, 2003).To understand the origin of bullies, there are several definitions that must be established and accepted:1. Responsibility is the willingness to be held accountable.2. Accountability is the obligation to justify the use of organizational resources.3. Authority is the right to control the use of organizational resources.These definitions are the foundation of the argument presented herein. Responsibility is a word that is overused, and therefore easily dismissed. (McCabe, 1989). It is found on nearly every diploma, certificate, and award within the phrase rights and responsibilities. However, hundreds of thousands of examples exist that show people shirking their responsibilities while exercising their rights. Might such documents hold more weight if they were to say rights and obligations? Similarly, it is a daily occurrence to hear, It's your responsibility to... or, I'm giving you the responsibility to.... Anyone who has worked with an irresponsible person knows the futility of the latter statement.Since irresponsible people do not want to be held accountable and cannot be given responsibility they don't possess, it would be folly to delegate authority to them. An irresponsible person who is given authority is an organizationally-created bully. The repercussions are potentially devastating to an organization's long-term viability. Lawsuits are the most obvious consequence of irresponsible behavior, be they for negligence, gross negligence, fraud, or contributing to someone's death. That is only a partial list of grievances that follow irresponsibility.The authors' insistence on precision in word usage is grounded in semantics. Semantics is the study of meanings imparted by interrelationships of words, phrases, and sentences. are all we have, really, according to the late comedian George Carlin. (Brown, 2008, p. 1). Books, articles, and commentaries about the importance of words are abundant. Words and their meanings are shaped by people but individuals are also shaped by words.Two concepts point to establishing clear definitions of words used between and among employees. The first of these is semantics, a doctrine aimed at recognizing the essential benefit of using words and symbols appropriate to a desired outcome (Webster, 2009). Finally, rhetoric encompasses various writing and/or speaking skills essential to communicating and persuading an audience as to expected behaviors (Webster, 2009).In the United States, broadcast networks have Standards and Practices Departments that are safeguarding the moral, ethical, and legal implications of programs aired by the network. In the 1950s, words such as pregnant could not be spoken on the air. This was so even when Lucille Ball was actually pregnant while filming the I Love Lucy show. She could be with child, or in a family way, or expecting, but never the single word pregnant. (Semonche, 2007; FCC Encyclopedia, 2012).Hundreds of legal outcomes have been based on the interpretation of a single word. Examples abound, but a few include:In Flagship Credit Corporation, v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company (2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12201 [5th Cir. Tex., June 15, 2012]) the court's decision turned on the word: penalty. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,045

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,022
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,022
Communication savante0,0130,029
Science ouverte0,0010,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of organizational culture, communication and conflictMême sujetInformation and Cyber SecurityTravaux en français237 207