MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2620176398 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.1016.1016

Pediatric Emergency Department Adherence to the 2014 National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Guidelines Targeting Analgesic Therapy in the Management of Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episodes in Children with Sickle Cell Disease: a Multicenter Perspective

2016· article· en· W2620176398 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Claudia R. Morris, Fahd A. Ahmad, Jonathan E. Bennett, Seema Bhatt, Amanda Bogie, Kathleen Brown, T. Charles Casper, Laura L. Chapman, Corrie E. Chumpitazi, Daniel M. Cohen, Carlton Dampier, Angela M. Ellison, Hartmut Grasemann, Robert W. Hickey, Lewis L. Hsu, Peter A. Lane, Sara Leibovich, Prahbumallikarjum Patil, Elizabeth C. Powell, Rachel Richards, Syana Sarnaik, Debra L. Weiner, David C. Brousseau

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineEmergency departmentTriageVaso-occlusive crisisAcute chest syndromeDosingGuidelineEmergency medicinePain assessmentHydromorphoneOpioidSickle cell anemiaPhysical therapyDiseasePain managementInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Pain is the leading cause of hospitalization and pediatric emergency department (PED) visits for children with sickle cell disease (SCD). The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) recommends rapid evaluation and treatment of moderate-severe vaso-occlusive pain episodes (VOEs) in the acute care setting, with timely pain assessments and repeat analgesia delivery to control pain. Quality-of-care indicators for children with SCD include the receipt of parenteral analgesia within 30 minutes of triage or 60 minutes of registration, with frequent pain reassessments and re-dosing of opioids within 30 minutes. Objective: To assess adherence to the 2014 NHLBI guideline for VOE management with respect to time to 1st and 2ndparenteral opioid delivery and time to pain assessment and its reassessment frequency in PEDs across the United States and Canada. Methods: A retrospective chart review evaluated 20 consecutive charts per site from 20 high-volume PEDs (n=400 charts total) including 14 Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) sites, assessing children age 3-21 years with SCD/VOE receiving parenteral opioids. Time from arrival and triage/room placement (whichever came first) to 1st and 2ndparenteral opioid administration, and time to pain assessment and reassessment were assessed. Adoption of bedside registration after triage/room placement at many sites decreased the relevance of a 60-minute window from registration; we therefore focused on triage time/room placement and arrival time to determine our quality outcome measures. Results: Annual SCD/VOE volume based on ICD-9 code discharge diagnosis for the 20 PED sites combined was 6082 visits, with an admission rate of 66%. Overall admission rate for the 400 patient chart review was 67%. Mean age of the chart review cohort was 14±5 years, 54% were female, and the majority (92%) had HbSS. Median (IQR) time from arrival to room placement was 4 (0, 10) minutes, while median time from triage/rooming to intravenous (IV) catheter placement was 46 (28, 76) minutes. Median time from triage/room placement to 1st parenteral opioid was 56 (32, 94) minutes; 24% within 30 min, 28% 31-60 min, and 48% >60 min. A total of 46% of patients received parenteral opioids within 60 minutes of ED arrival time. Analysis of children who received two or more opioid doses revealed that only 17% received a 2nd parenteral opioid dose within 30 minutes of their 1st dose. Only 17% of the cohort received both their 1st dose within 30 minutes of triage and 2nd parenteral opioid within 30 minutes of the first. Mean total number of parenteral opioid doses given while in the PED (min-max) was 2.4 (1-13), over a median (IQR) of 5 hours (4, 7) spent in the PED prior to disposition home or to the inpatient ward. Of admitted patients (n=268), 18% received only a single dose of parenteral opioids while in the PED, 30% received 2 doses and 52% received 3 or more doses. Pain assessment scores were documented in 99% of charts, within a median of 3 minutes (0, 12) of triage/rooming, and 89% had documentation of pain reassessment, occurring within a median of 27 minutes (10.0, 52.0) of 1stparenteral opioid delivery. The mean number of pain assessments documented during the PED stay was 5±2. Conclusions:Delays in pain management for children with SCD commonly occur across PEDs, despite NHLBI recommendations for rapid evaluation and treatment of VOEs in the acute care setting. Only a minority of children received rapid parenteral opioid administration defined by the 2014 NIH guidelines, although pain assessment is often performed immediately and with frequent reassessments. Although the majority of patients are rapidly triaged and placed in rooms, children commonly wait 45 minutes or longer for IV placement, which could contribute to delays in delivery of parenteral opioids. This data help identify areas for quality improvement that can be targeted to improve patient care in the future. Disclosures Morris: Nourish Life: Patents & Royalties: I am inventor of IP owned by UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Licenced to Nourish Life; Nestle: Honoraria; Calithera: Consultancy; Endeavor: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; MAST: Research Funding. Dampier:Eli Lilly and Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hsu:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Hilton Publishing: Consultancy, Research Funding; EMMI Solutions: Consultancy; Purdue Pharma: Research Funding; Gerson Lehman Group: Consultancy; Mast Therapeutics: Research Funding; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sancilio: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,073
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,146

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersTravaux en français237 207