Exploring the context-embedded nature of followership
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Contemporary theorizing positions leadership and followership as emergent roles that co-evolve out of a shared understanding of who will lead and who will follow in a given social interaction (Uhl-Bien et al., 2014). Based on this social constructivist viewpoint, the notion that followership represents a static role dictated by hierarchical boundaries is oversimplified, and followership is better understood as a dynamic process that is contextually-situated. Thus, the purpose of our study was to explore how interpretations of followership differ across the contexts in which sport teams operate. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fourteen coaches of Canadian Interuniversity Sport teams to capture contextually-situated descriptions of followership. The conduct and corresponding analysis of interviews were guided by Srivastava and Hopwood’s (2009) reflexive iterative framework. The thematic analysis revealed several personality characteristics that were consistently described in relation to ideal followership (i.e., active independent thought, balanced processing of information, collective orientation, relational transparency). Coaches noted, however, that the perceived utility of followership behaviours depended upon contextual boundaries including the performance demands of a given situation, whether interactions were in public or private, and the topic under discussion (e.g., personnel decisions were often non-negotiable). Followership expectations also differed according to the interpersonal dynamics at play, which included the relative status of individuals involved in the leader-follower interaction and their relationship history. Despite coaches’ precision in specifying how their expectations of followership differed across contexts, six coaches indicated that they never explicitly broached the topic of followership with their teams. Nevertheless, coaches’ interpretations of followership offer insight into the context-embedded nature of followership and elucidate how acts of followership are implicated in the leadership process. Conceptual considerations for future work examining followership in sport are discussed in relation to the extant theories of followership in organizational contexts. Acknowledgments: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Michael Smith Foreign Study Supplement
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».