Mind your music: The effects of music-induced mood and arousal across different memory tasks.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Music is prevalent in our daily lives. Many of us listen to music to help improve focus, to block out distractions, or to make a tedious task more enjoyable. However, it is unclear how this daily soundtrack affects our cognitive performance, particularly learning and memory. Although many studies support the idea that listening to music can aid learning and facilitate memory (de Groot, 2006; Foster & Valentine, 2001; Lord & Garner, 1993), other studies have shown that listening to music can interfere with important processes required for learning and memory (Iwanaga & Ito, 2002; Jancke & Sandmann, 2010; Salame & Baddeley, 1989). Some of the discrepancies in the literature may have arisen from the use of different memory paradigms across studies (e.g., recall vs. recognition). Therefore, the current study examined the effect of background music on different types of memory. Two potential mechanisms have been proposed to explain how background music influences memory, and these factors form the foundation of the current study. The first possibility is that background music modulates the listener's internal mood and arousal levels, which may then enhance memory performance (Greene, Bahri, & Soto, 2010; Husain, Thompson, & Schellenberg, 2002; Thompson, Schellenberg, & Husain, 2001). For example, negative moods can worsen memory, whereas positive moods can improve memory (Aube, Peretz, & Armony, 2013; Eschrich, Munte, & Altenmuller, 2008; Rowe, Hirsh, & Anderson, 2007). Furthermore, extremely high and low levels of arousal can impair memory performance, whereas moderate levels can enhance memory performance (Berlyne, 1971; Diamond, Campbell, Park, Halonen, & Zoladz, 2007; Dutton & Carroll, 2001). The second possibility is that background music operates through associative mechanisms, establishing a context that, when reinstated, cues memory recall (Balch & Lewis, 1996; Balch, Myers, & Papotto, 1999; Mead & Ball, 2007; Smith, 1985; Standing, Bobbitt, Boisvert, Dayholos, & Gagnon, 2008). Thus, hearing a piece of music might bring to mind the information that was previously encoded when the music was present. Both of these possibilities have experimental support; however, to our knowledge their influences on memory have not been compared in the same study. Therefore, the current study examined whether background music affects verbal memory and whether that effect can be attributed to mood, arousal, context, or some combination of all these factors.Background Music and MemoryThe benefit of music on memory often requires the integration of the music with the to-be-remembered items of the task (Rubin, 1977; Serafine, Crowder, & Repp, 1984; Wallace, 1994). For example, there is evidence that text is better recalled when it is heard as a song rather than as speech (Wallace, 1994). In the current study, however, the focus was to examine the effect of background music on memory, which is different from music that might be integrated with the to-be-remembered items. Here, the background music was arbitrarily paired rather than intentionally paired with the to-be-remembered items because the background music that we experience in our daily lives is not typically integrated with the task we are performing.Whether background music enhances learning and memory has yet to be fully elucidated because the effects are inconsistent. Some studies have found that background music has either no effect on memory (Hirokawa, 2004; Jancke & Sandmann, 2010; Miller & Schyb, 1989), worsens memory (Hallam, Price, & Katsarou, 2002; Iwanaga & Ito, 2002; Reaves, Graham, Grahn, Rabannifard, & Duarte, 2016), or improves memory (de Groot, 2006; Eschrich et al., 2008; Richards, Fassbender, Bilgin, & Thompson, 2008). Although the findings of the aforementioned studies are mixed, one meta-analysis has identified several studies where background music had a detrimental effect on memory compared with silence (Kampfe, Sedlmeier, & Renkewitz, 2011). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».