MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2623572142 · doi:10.2118/0517-0012-jpt

Comments: Peak Demand or Too Much Oil?

2017· article· en· W2623572142 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Donnelly

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPosition (finance)Renewable energyConsumption (sociology)PortfolioNatural resource economicsEconomyEconomicsBusinessEngineeringFinance

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Editor's column Momentum is building for what is being called the “peak demand” theory—that before too long global oil demand will begin to fall as transportation efficiency, innovations such as electric cars, and government climate change policies will quell the rising consumption of hydrocarbons that has marked the past several decades. What is getting attention is that this sentiment is no longer coming from what could be termed anti-oil interests but is coming from the likes of Shell’s chief executive officer (CEO) and such organizations as the World Energy Council (WEC). Speaking at an energy conference in Houston in March, Shell CEO Ben van Beurden predicted that world oil demand could peak in the late 2020s because of the growth of renewable energy sources and natural gas. He noted that his company is moving toward a lower-carbon, long-term strategy. Shell recently divested most of its Canadian oil sands position and is increasing its position in natural gas. Last year, it bought the BG Group, which built up its natural gas portfolio. Van Beurden emphasized that the industry must reduce carbon dioxide emissions to help countries meet the recent Paris climate change accord goals. The WEC has predicted that global energy consumption will begin declining in a little over a decade, and its eighth annual survey of energy executives around the world showed that growth in renewables and energy efficiency is requiring firms to revise their medium- and long-term outlooks. The peak demand theory undercuts the prevailing industry notion that a rising middle class in developing countries will propel oil demand much higher. Just a few years ago, the industry and many economists were fretting about a shortage of energy supplies to meet this growing consumption. At the same conference where Shell’s CEO spoke, the head of the International Energy Agency (IEA), Fatih Birol, said that global demand is not peaking and in fact will grow by 7.3 million B/D through 2022. He pleaded with oil companies to invest more, otherwise the world would face an oil shortage in the future and the prospect of huge price spikes. He noted that even though sales of electric cars had risen to a record number of more than 1 million, this was still less than 1% of total global auto sales. The trucking, airline, and chemical sectors will continue to drive oil growth, he said. In general, the oil industry is not good at predicting the future. The oil price decline in the late 1990s, the huge run-up in prices led by surging Chinese and Indian demand in the early 2000s, the strength of the price collapse of the past 2 years, and the resilience of the US shale sector all seemed to catch much of the industry flat-footed. The growth in unconventional production has only made supply/demand forecasts tougher. The argument might not be so much about peak demand, but about timing. The industry as well as organizations such as the IEA have predicted that global hydrocarbon use would decline this century and that natural gas would be the “bridge to the future” of economies built more around renewable energy sources. The question is whether that will come in 15 years, 30 years, or even longer.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,885
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,490

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,313
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Petroleum TechnologyMême sujetGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchTravaux en français237 207