Review of Abraham: One God, Three Wives, Five Religions by Frances Worthington
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abraham: One God Three Wives Five Religions. By Frances Worthington. : Baha'i Publishing, 2011. xiii + 242 pages, including appendices, footnotes, bibliography, index.Compared with generation ago, it seems that fewer people today, even those brought up in religious home, understand much of religious history. Indeed, many reach adulthood without having read any religious scripture. Of those who do, how many could articulate the significant contributions of the Prophet Abraham? Frances Worthington, in Abraham: One God Three Wives Five Religions, succeeds in providing not only chronological depiction of Abraham's life but also comprehensive narrative synthesized from variety of scriptural and traditional accounts taken from Jewish, Christian, Moslem, and Bahai sources.At the outset, Worthington laments the difficulty inherently faced in [c] rearing an exact timeframe for the events of Abraham's life . . . [Tor] His date of birth remains elusive (9). She then proceeds to share the events of His life and the distinct role each family member played in the emergence of the first monotheistic faith on Earth, but not before asking her readers to grant her bit of freedom as historian and storyteller.This book is not work of fiction because I've remained within the bounds of what is indicated by combination of scriptural text, historical data, and archaeological evidence. Nevertheless, for the sake of readability and just plain fun, the storyline is delicately dusted with the tasty spices of probably and possibly. (5)One should not regard this declaration as suggesting that Worthington is anything less than dedicated to her craft as historian, for she weaves scriptural, historical, and archaeological sources so extensively and impressively that she exemplifies nothing but the highest degree of scholarship. What one appreciates about her work, though, is her willingness to explore the nature of the historical record with keen eye that scans for the probable and possible spiritual implications and subtleties inherent in that record. In so doing, she creates unique and more profound understanding of Abraham's life than mere retelling of the events would merit.For example, she questions why the Bible names Abraham's oppressor, Nimrod, when no historical record outside of scripture can be found of king bearing that name ruling Mesopotamia at the time of Abraham. Like detective eager to solve mystery, she uncovers clues that link Abraham's Nimrod to Noah's great-grandson of the same name. She does this by examining what seems like an unrelated yet seemingly deplorable account of Noah's naked drunkenness. Drawing upon biblical and Bahai passages suggesting deeper meaning, she explains that Noah was not actually drunk but intoxicated with the wine of the All-Merciful (16) and that His nakedness symbolized being stripped ... of earthly desires (17). His sons Shem and Japheth cover His nakedness with the fresh garment . . . of their respect (17) while His son Ham is appalled by and rejects his father's nakedness (Abraham's willingness to discard old attire-traditions, customs, beliefs-in favor of new Revelation). Ham's grandson Nimrod likewise rejects Abraham's message and becomes a ruler so cruel and ungodly that his name quickly degenerates into an epithet for anyone who is cruel, calculating, and unholy (18), the very embodiment of the king whose namesake persecutes Abraham.This is the kind of insight with which Worthington enriches our understanding of Abraham's life. This is equally true when she relates both the physical and spiritual implications of other events in His life whether they be the appearance of new star in the Mesopotamian heaven prior to His birth, or the moment when the young Abraham recognizes the impotence of manmade idols and sets out to prove this, in most humorous manner, to His father. One also learns of the likely link between the shrines Abraham builds throughout Canaan and the famine that ensues thereafter. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».