Public perception of a dangerous person in psychotic exacerbation on the example of a court expert judgement case
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The present paper describes a case of a patient who committed a criminal offence and was then judged by the media, and especially by web surfers. Mental illness of the patient was not taken into account, this possibility having been treated as a way getting away with the crime. The purpose of the present paper was to demonstrate stigmatisation of the mentally ill, which stems primarily from the ignorance of society. Case description: According to the case files, the suspect was a 32-year old male with higher education who, during a visit to his family in Canada, had a "nervous breakdown" and returned to Poland to be admitted to a psychiatric hospital. After a week, he was discharged from hospital. After 8 months, he had a recurrence of the illness and was once more referred to mandatory treatment. According to the medical documentation, the suspect suffered from an acute polymorphic psychotic disorder with symptoms of schizophrenia. During his stay in hospitals, he uttered delusions of remote control, persecution, reference and grandeur. In the course of hospitalisation, he was aggressive towards the environment and had auditory hallucinations. After approximately two months of the date of leaving the hospital, the subject discontinued his medication. As a result of recurrence of the illness and while driving a car at an excessive speed, he caused a major traffic accident, endangering the lives and health of many people. Comment: On the basis of the case files, the available medical documentation and the conducted judicial and psychiatric examination, court experts concluded that the suspect was mentally ill, i.e. that he suffered from paranoid schizophrenia. However, he was not mentally impaired, albeit, at the time of committing the act he was accused of, he was completely unable to recognise the meaning of his actions and make decisions concerning the way he behaved.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle