MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W262563095

Anglican and Episcopal Readings

2000· article· en· W262563095 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnglican Theological Review · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligious Freedom and Discrimination
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBishopsConventionProtestantismLawSynodChurch historyTheologyHistorySociologyClassicsPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Since I am a lifelong Lutheran and a pastor in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America and have been teaching Episcopal Church History and English Church History at the School of Theology for over 30 years, I have devoted much of my reading to the subjects I teach, subjects I knew very little about when I came here. I have concentrated especially on primary sources such as the Journals of General Conventions, the reports of the Lambeth Conferences, and the reports of the Anglican Consultative Council meetings. In a sense, the Journal of the 72nd General Convention of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America Otherwise Known as Episcopal Church 1997 is three books. First there is the Report to the 72nd General Convention Otherwise Known as Blue Book: Reports and Resolutions of the Committees, Commissions, Boards and Agencies of the General Convention of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, USA for Consideration in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, July Sixteenth to Twenty-fifth Inclusive, in the Year of Our Lord, 1997, 550 pages. It contains the reports from the interim bodies of General Convention and is the primary source of their work. Whether one agrees with the reports or not, here is the thinking and the work of the Episcopal Church between General Conventions. While it is distributed to bishops and deputies, others may purchase copies as the dean's office always does here at the School of Theology. Second there is the Journal of the 72nd General Convention ... 1997, 950 pages. This contains the directory, the minutes of the House of Bishops, the minutes of the House of Deputies, summaries and indexes, and supplements (more about this last topic later). This volume is indispensable for knowing and understanding the actions of General Convention. While at times it is difficult reading, it is well worth the effort. third volume is Supplement to the Journal of the 72nd General Convention ... 1997, 442 pages. This includes a directory of the interim bodies, addresses, appendices to the General Convention minutes, and reports not included in Blue Book. An example is the Concordat of Agreement between the Episcopal Church and the ELCA. A fourth volume, so to speak, is the Constitution and Canons For the Government of the Protestant Episcopal Church... Together With Rules Of Order Adopted in General Conventions 1789-1997 Revised by the 1997 Convention, 245 pages. This volume is revised after each General Convention. I require students to read in all four volumes. Another volume of required reading for those in the Anglican tradition are the official reports of the Lambeth Conferences. Official Report of the Lambeth Conference 1998: Transformation and Renewal, July 18-August 9, 1998, Lambeth Palace, Canterbury, England (Harrisburg, PA: Morehouse Publishing, 1999), 534 pages, is the latest volume. This volume includes The Virginia Report, the reports, the plenary presentations, the resolutions, sermons, and a list of participants. Whether one agrees or not, this statement gets one's attention: `shall we starve our children to pay our debts?'-the creditors, led by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), say, .yes, you pay your debts before you feed your children. Yes, you prioritize repayment of debts over expenditure on health, education, clean water and sanitation. Yes, your children shall face unlimited liability for the debts of their governments' (p. 356). A helpful secondary reflection is James E. Solheim, Diversity or Disunity? Reflections on Lambeth 1998 (New York: Church Publishing Incorporated, 1999). Another helpful volume with regard to Lambeth is Roger Coleman, ed., Resolutions of the Twelve Lambeth Conferences 1867-1988 (Toronto: Anglican Book Centre, 1992). first meeting of the Anglican Consultative Council was in Limuru, Kenya, February 23-March 5, 1971, and it meets every three years. report of the last Council meeting is James M. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,892
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,313 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle