Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This is an important topic, as all too frequently children are exposed (as a witness or recipient) to domestic violence and scars are left. This book resulted from a conference held in London, Ontario in 2001: the International Conference on Children Exposed to Domestic Violence. Nine out of twenty-eight of the contributors are from Canada with the rest from the United States. This volume is dedicated to Robbie Crossman (a contributor) who died in 2002. The book consists of fourteen chapters that touch on a variety of parameters of the subject. Part I (four chapters) introduces the problem. Part II (four chapters) focuses on individual and group responses. In Part III (five chapters) systems level responses are explicated. In the final section (one chapter) conclusions are drawn and future directions identified. It was disappointing for me to note that there was no mention of domestic violence in aboriginal families; a significant oversight. Unfortunately there hasn’t been a lot of research in this area, leading the editors to espouse that much needs to be done. Nevertheless there is evidence that children exposed to loved ones being abused show evidence of hyper arousal and emotional dysfunction. In the custody situation, it was believed that children are at less risk once the parents are living separately. Bancroft and Silverman in their excellent chapter (chapter 7 pp 101–119) provide ample evidence that this is not so. As mentioned above, there is no mention of domestic violence in aboriginal families. Rather what is described is happenings in the 18.4% of the Canadian immigrant population, with programs that have been developed to get the message across that violence is not acceptable. Mention is made of the role of the police and the courts. A review by the London group (chapter 11, pp 171–187) demonstrated that there is a need for training. In particular, in custody cases there are many unfounded assumptions (e.g. kids are safe once the parents separate; it is detrimental for kids not to have access to their fathers even though he has demonstrated abusive behaviour). Assessors and the courts need to be educated as to the realities of risk. They conclude saying that, although more is known at this time, there is still much to learn. Research is necessary and long term follow up. There are some real gems in the book but generally I found the book somewhat disappointing in that much was descriptive with little report of what research is available. I would not recommend buying this book but rather, if interested, borrow it from the library.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».