MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W262695117

Implantable microsystems for high-resolution interfacing to the brain.

2013· article· en· W262695117 sur OpenAlexaff
Amir M. Sodagar

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Établissements canadiensPolytechnique Montréal
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInterfacingMicrosystemIntegrated circuitComputer scienceElectrical engineeringElectronicsAerospaceEngineeringNanotechnologyMaterials scienceComputer hardware
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Almost a decade after the invention of the first semiconductor transistor in 1948, it took the revolutionary technology almost a decade to evolve from producing single devices to integrating only a few transistors as the first integrated circuit (IC) in 1958. Since then, integrated circuits have been in continuous progress for more than half a century as predicted by the well-known Moore's law. While integrated circuits still continue their progress with the same exponential pace, it is almost a decade that a new branch of science and technology has emerged, known as integrated microsystems. This can be taken as the natural technological evolution from individual circuit chips and non-circuit modules to complete systems with small physical dimensions and light weight. Integrated microsystems have opened windows of hope to providing efficient solutions to some of the problems that have not been resolvable by any other means whatsoever. Among many kinds of microsystems being developed for a wide variety of applications, such as automotive industry, aerospace engineering, environmental monitoring, and defense systems, implantable biomedical microsystems are of increasing interest to both medical and engineering communities. This is mainly because of the capabilities such devices are expected to provide on the medical side, and also the technical challenges available on the engineering side. Examples of biomedical implants are pacemakers, cochlear implants, neural recording microsystems, and deep brain stimulators. Electrically interfacing with the nervous system goes back to Benjamin Franklin's works no more than 250 years. Intra-cortical interfacing with the brain with high density and at the same time with high spatial resolution is, however, a rather new concept, being made possible by using unique capabilities advanced microtechnology has to offer. This technology is capable of implementing complex circuits with up to millions of transistors on silicon chips as small as a few millimeters on a side, realizing non-electronic structures such as probes and electrodes with sub-micron fabrication resolution, and finally integrating and packaging of all the electronic and non-electronic parts required to make a tiny implantable microsystem. Implantable neural interfacing microsystems are known as powerful tools to enable neuroscientists perform high-density intra-cortical studies in the order of tens to hundreds and even thousands of parallel channels, and with high spatial resolution in the order of hundreds to tens of micrometers and even finer. It is also believed that such devices can successfully treat neural disorders such as epilepsy, paralysis, and Parkinson's disease, and even help effectively overcome deafness and blindness. On the non-medical side, researchers in cognitive sciences are among the other groups that anxiously await fully functional neural interfacing implants, using which they can talk to the brain and learn about how the signals sensed from the outside world are recognized. Implantable microsystems designed and developed for intra-cortically interfacing with the central nervous system can be considered among the most sophisticated types of biomedical implants, possessing perhaps the most interesting applications. The extent of interest attracted to research in this area is clearly reflected in the daily increasing number of publications on the design and application of such devices. As evidence, Fig. 1 shows the exponential-like growth of papers and other relevant scientific and technical documents being published. This plot is the result of a search over Elsevier Scopus database for documents of any type with the words ‘microsystem’ and ‘neural’ in their titles, abstracts, or keywords. Figure 1 Number of scientific and technical documents published with the words ‘microsystem’ and ‘neural’ in their titles, abstracts, or keywords An implantable neural interfacing microsystem, in general, comprises a microelectrode array (MEA), an analog front-end interfacing with the target tissue for recording and stimulation, and a radio frequency (RF) front-end for wireless interfacing to the external world. In order to be fully implantable, a neural interfacing microsystem needs to fulfill the following requirements: Small physical size–No matter how powerful it is, it is evident that a microsystem needs to be small enough in size in order to be implanted in the brain without considerable damage to neighboring organisms and living tissues. Wireless operation–An implantable microsystem needs to bidirectionally communicate to an external setup through wireless connection. Programming a neural interfacing implant to operate in the proper mode, setting parameters such as amplification gain and bandwidth for recording and the details stimulation pulses for stimulation necessitate the flow of data from the external side to the implant. In the reverse direction, one needs to transfer recorded neural data from the implant to the external setup, too. Packaging– Electronic circuitry in an implant, need to be properly packaged and sealed in order to be protected from undesired chemical and electrochemical interactions with their surroundings. Moreover, packaging of an implant is sometimes necessary in order to protect the living body from the toxic materials used in the implant. Biocompatibility–It is also of crucial importance to avoid bringing materials in touch with the body that might cause irritation, inflammation, or any other undesired reactions by the body. Even if the materials used for the development of an implant are not toxic, it is important to avoid unwanted reactions the body might show to the implant as a foreign object. For these reasons, implantable microsystems are either made out of biocompatible materials such as silicon, titanium, platinum, or gold, or encapsulated with materials such as silicone and parylene. Over the past few decades, depth and breadth of research on the design, development, and employments of implantable neural interfacing microsystems has been expanding with an admirably rapid pace. These devices are expected to revolutionalize research in the near future not only in basic and clinical neuroscience, but also in so many other application areas.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,264

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMedMême sujetNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringTravaux en français237 207