Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Leonard was born in Moscow, Russia, not Idaho, in 1923 and came to the United States to New York City with his family in 1928. New York, as you know, was then, much more than now, a center of America's sport and culture, and Leonard was certainly drawn to it. In 1948, two years after receiving a B.A. from Columbia University, he joined the sports staff at the New York Herald Tribune. In 1954 he moved to the New York Post, and in 1963, to the New York Times. In 1979 he heeded Horace Greeley's advice, moving to Palo Alto, California, as a sports editor and columnist for the Peninsula Times Tribune. He assumed emeritus status in 1984 but continued to write for the Times Tribune and, since 1993, for the Oakland Tribune. Leonard Koppett has long been my favorite sports journalist for the very reasons that he enjoys preeminence in his profession. From 1964 to 1984 I devoured his weekly columns in Sporting News. In a profession dominated by personal opinion and anecdotal evidence, he approaches his craft as a teacher and an educator. I have read most of his twelve books, four of which have been revised and reissued, and they share the same characteristics. Many people know a lot about sports; Leonard Koppett understands sports. He has an uncanny knack for offering in new ways commonsense insights that prompt readers to say, Of course, that's obvious. Why didn't I think of that? For example, A Thinking Man's Guide to Baseball, which came out in 1967, remains, I think, the best explanation of the game on the field and behind the scenes. If you haven't read that book and you think you understand baseball, pick it up and you will learn a lot. Essence of the Game Is Deception explores the essentials of a fundamentally flawed sport, basketball, and Man in the Dugout offers a revealing examination of the personalities and styles of baseball's most famous skippers by tracing their lineage to the managerial Stengel, Mack, McGraw, and Rickey. For anyone desiring to comprehend America's obsession with sports and journalism's role in stating it, Sport's Illusion, Sport's Reality, recently issued by the University of Illinois Press, remains one of those rare must-reads. And, of course, his Concise History of Major League Baseball I think is the most comprehensive and serviceable history of the subject. I'm not the only one impressed with Leonard Koppett. His peers elected him chairman of the New York Chapter of the Baseball's Writers' Association of America, of the New York Football Writers' Association, and of the Metropolitan New York Basketball Writers' Association. He received the J. G. Taylor Spink Award in 1992 and the Hank Gowdy Award in 1994, thereby becoming the only journalist to become enshrined in both the baseball and the basketball Halls of Fame. I am delighted that Leonard agreed to speak to us tonight, and so will you be, so please welcome the thinking fan's sports journalist and baseball historian, Leonard Koppett. JOURNALIST I am a journalist, not an academic, so as a journalist I have certain degrees of freedom that academics do not. I found out very early in the game that the way you make a logical argument is to ignore everything that doesn't fit, and the same goes for research. I wanted to take a little different tack with you tonight and discuss what all of us have been reading and hearing and talking ourselves about baseball for the last ten or twelve years--what terrible things have gone wrong and what are we going to do to fix it. My take is the opposite of that. I think baseball has never been as good as it is, has never had as good a time as it is having, right now. That's why I made this little title that we have: The Golden Age That We Have: Who's Knocking It and Why. That's the tack I want to take. Now, again, I have done no research. I'm not going to give you any factual backing for what I'm going to say. These are conclusions, not the laying out, as you have been hearing in these papers today, the evidence for the conclusions. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».