'Byron and Identity' 33rd International Byron Conference 9-13 July 2007 Venice International University
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I loved her from my boyhood; she to me Was as a fairy city of the heart, Rising like water-columns from the sea, Of joy the sojourn, and of wealth the mart; And Otway, Radcliffe, Schiller, Shakespeare's art, Had stamp'd her image in me. (CHP, IV, 4) It seems fitting that this year's International Byron Conference, with its theme of 'Byron and Identity', was held in a city that was so central to Byron's own sense of self. That the image of Venice was stamped not just on the narrator of Childe Harold's Pilgrimage but in him suggests an intimate merging of geographical location and selfhood. And just as the works of Shakespeare and Radcliffe impressed Byron with a Romantic vision of a fairy city so, for readers of Byron, Venice will always be the city of Childe Harold, Marino Faliero and The Two Foscari. The centrality of Venice to Byron's life and poetry - in addition to the fact that the city played host to one of the most fondly remembered of all IBS conferences in 1986 - gave the 33rd International Byron Conference a particularly monumental feel. It certainly attracted a large number of delegates, drawing not only leading academics and researchers but also newly enthused students and readers of Byron from around the world. The opening plenary immediately challenged our conceptions of identity, with Jerome McGann appearing to look very much like Bernard Beatty. It turned out that Professor McGann's arrival was delayed, so we were treated to a brilliant and entertaining paper by Beatty (Liverpool) on the familial and 'abyssal' meanings of names in Byron's poetry. We then separated for some excellent parallel sessions, re-grouping for mid-morning and afternoon snacks that could only be described as molto delizioso. If the papers had not been so consistently outstanding, there would have a been a real danger of our lingering in the snack room all day, gazing at the view and munching on biscotti. The necessary parallel sessions meant that it was not possible to hear all the papers, but chats during the breaks suggested that the academic standard of this year's conference was very high. Stand-out papers included Tim Webb (Bristol) on Byron's use of Italian, Gavin Hopps (St Andrews) on Byron's ghostly 'shades of being', Andrew Stauffer (Boston) on forgery and the textual misappropriation of Byron's work, Tony Howe (Oxford) on heroic rhetoric and Tom Mole (McGill) on non-developmental narrative structures in Don Juan. We were also treated to a fascinating second plenary paper by Jane Stabler (St Andrews) on Byron's Victorian identities and the opposition between 'real' self and poetic self-expression. Perhaps the raciest session of the conference was on the theme of 'Byron and Venice'. Here David Laven (Manchester) began by suggesting that Byron knew very little about the political and social issues facing Venice at the time he was living there. Laven convincingly argued that the Venice Byron loved was an imagined, literary site which bore very little resemblance to the actual working city. Jack Wasserman (Byron Society of America) went on to give an entertaining discussion of homosexuality and the carnivalesque in Byron's Venice, while Peter Cochran finished with a paper on Pietro Buratti's jaw-dropping L'Elefanteide, a poetic account of the escape and subsequent death of a Venetian elephant, which Byron himself wrote of in a letter to Hobhouse. Cochran definitely wins the award for best prop of the conference, with his use of a bicycle horn to cover expletives that would have made even Byron blush. The San Servolo Special Session on Byron and Shelley was an especially interesting event, and another highlight of the conference. It began with Francesco Rognoni (Milan) suggesting that Julian and Maddalo has surprising connections to Rousseau's Confessions, as Shelley and Rousseau shared a similar distaste for the kind of life Byron led in Venice. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle