MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W265608184

Going Where No Taxman Has Gone Before: Preliminary Conclusions and Recommendations Drawn from a Decade of Debate on the International Taxation of E-Commerce

2009· article· en· W265608184 sur OpenAlex
Олександр Пастухов

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueRutgers computer & technology law journal · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueCorporate Taxation and Avoidance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRevenueTax revenueRecessionTaxpayerTax reformEconomicsBusinessState (computer science)Economic policyFinanceMarket economyPublic economics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I. INTRODUCTION The advent of e-commerce has forever changed how business is done. Internet operations have launched even smallest of undertakings into global markets and have made them part of an important industry with enormous potential. Such potential has led to enormous success: in 2008, despite recession, online retail sales in United States alone reached $133.6 billion, (1) up from overall sales of $22 billion in 1998. (2) Governments throughout world and relevant international organizations have recognized that if e-commerce remains beyond purview of tax authorities, it will present a significant problem for public finances. (3) In face of aging populations and their strain on national pension systems, lost tax revenue from e-commerce is not just another tax leak that budgets can afford. However, the application of today's taxing regimes to contemporary world of telecommunications and electronic commerce is uncertain, inconsistent, and complex. (4) The challenge for governments is to design a tax regime fit for this new cross-jurisdictional electronic environment. The power to tax is one of most fundamental prerogatives of every sovereign state. Raising tax revenue is a state's powerful instrument of macroeconomic management. Taxation affects legal, economic, social, political and fiscal conditions in any country. Therefore, it is not surprising that e-commerce was quick to appear on governments' tax radars. However, world's governments have been guarded in their reactions to suggested changes in their tax systems, as well as in existing system of international taxation. (5) As more and more businesses and individuals rely on Internet as their primary source of revenue, tax authorities around world are seeking a uniform solution for taxing e-commerce. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), European Union (EU), and U.S., Australian, and Canadian governments, among others, have issued reports identifying critical tax issues raised by advent of e-commerce. (6) Unfortunately, current position of governments worldwide can best be characterized as wait and see. (7) Despite a number of forums convened, commissions appointed and white papers issued, there remains little international accord, national legislation, or case law on taxation of e-commerce. In United States, Congress continues to ignore Supreme Court's invitation in Quill v. North Dakota to legislate on sales/use tax issue (8) and continues to extend moratorium on new Internet access taxes, which was originally imposed in 1998. (9) The World Trade Organization (WTO) has also maintained its own moratorium on customs duties on e-commerce, (l0) introduced as early as 1998. (11) Similarly, academia addressed various issues of taxing Internet business with great enthusiasm in early days of e-commerce, but now seems to be losing interest in issue. (12) Since governments and relevant international organizations are not taking action on Internet taxation, academics are writing less on subject. At same time, [w]hile talk about e-commerce tax issues has decreased in past few years, existence, and perhaps extent, of such issues has not decreased. (13) What is more, [t]he Internet continues to grow, sales continue to increase, and consequently [one] must implement solution now or risk repairing havoc later. (14) This is exactly why inquiries into tax aspects of doing business online should continue. This article reflects on past decade of debate regarding proper design of an international taxation regime that would fully reflect new economic realities brought about by e-commerce. It starts with both challenging and confirming some presumptions about contemporary e-commerce taxation and then offers a set of guidelines for reforming international taxation regime. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,336
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,472

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,208 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle