MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W266924205

A half-century of change on College Hill: institutional growth, historic preservation, and the College Hill Study

2011· article· en· W266924205 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlanning for higher education · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHigher Education Research Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQuarter (Canadian coin)ExpansiveState (computer science)Higher educationSociologyPoliticsPolitical sciencePublic administrationManagementLawHistoryArchaeologyEconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

One of the epicenters of the historic preservation movement in the United States, the east side of Providence is also home to Brown University and Rhode Island School of Design. Preservation leaders and institutional leaders--sometimes adversaries, sometimes partners--took meandering path toward the expansive notion of Historic Providence that we see today. This article will explore the changing notions of cities, preservation, and institutional development on what is aptly called College Hill. It is story of mutual support, conflicting values, and an extraordinary act of planning: the College Hill Study. Providence, the capital of Rhode Island, was founded in 1636 by Roger Williams, who was fleeing the constraints of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Located about an hour south of Boston and about three hours northeast of New York City, it serves as the political, business, medical, cultural, and educational center of what is essentially city-state. Its colleges and hospitals are its largest employers and some of its largest landowners. (They do not, however, pay property taxes.) It is home to four independent colleges and universities--Brown University, Providence College, Johnson & Wales University, and Rhode Island School of Design (RISD)--that in total enroll over 20,000 students, most of them from outside the state. The most well-known, of course, is Brown University, located at the top of College Hill. In the 18th century, the college--then Rhode Island College--grew what was then significant distance, about quarter mile, from the residential and commercial center of Providence near the river. The original buildings sit on the Green; the open lawns and 18th- and early 19th-century buildings make perfect vision of the Ivy League (see figure 1.) Outside of the wrought-iron gates of the Green--and before the university's post-World War II expansion--a residential neighborhood grew up, mostly 19th- and early 20th-century houses and small commercial center. [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] RISD (pronounced riz-dee) came later, established by prominent women who were inspired by the new technology showcased at the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia. By 1877 they had formed museum and school of art and design, and by the early 20th century RISD had block of buildings near the river along the side of the hill between the downtown and Brown, as shown in the aerial photograph (see figure 2). RISD tore down some existing buildings and built new, but mostly it grew by accretion--buying and re-using existing buildings, such as Carr House at the corner of Benefit and Waterman streets (see figure 3). In the older part of town, the residences around RISD were often colonial and federal houses of the 18th and 19th century. As the U.S. population grew after World War II, the suburbs became the ideal of the modern environment. Cities were dirty, the buildings old. Urban renewal was by no means new concept--do New Yorkers bemoan the loss of the neighborhoods that became Central Park? Title One of the Housing Act of 1949 kick-started the program that would reshape American cities. The act provided federal funding to cities to cover the cost of acquiring areas perceived to be slums. (The federal government paid two-thirds of the cost of acquiring the site, while local governments paid the remaining one-third.) Those sites were then given to private developers to construct new housing. (A building's history or architectural character, or that of neighborhood, was not taken into account in the process.) The phrase used at the time was urban redevelopment Providence was ready. According to Thomas E. Deller, director of the Department of Planning and Community Development for the city, the completely new 1951 zoning ordinance was designed to suburbanize the city. The city published educational materials that showed a blighted area with buildings right up to the sidewalk next to redeveloped with broad setbacks (see figure 4). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,734
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,801

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,156
Tête enseignante GPT0,386
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle