MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W267517404

The Creation of Dr. Kane

2008· article· en· W267517404 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTransactions of the American Philosophical Society · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueSpace Exploration and Technology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArcticSpace AgeAdministration (probate law)WitnessPrestigeSpace (punctuation)NavyThe arcticPolitical scienceLawHistoryAeronauticsEngineeringGeologyComputer scienceOceanography
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Today is somewhat difficult to understand why, in the mid-nineteenth century, nations were so obsessed with arctic exploration. It was a vastly dangerous enterprise that yielded almost nothing of practical gain, and by the 1820s was amply clear that, even if the fabled did exist, would be impractical because of the dangers of arctic navigation. It was also clear that any arctic that could be claimed would be largely useless; no settlers were going to homestead amidst polar bears and glaciers. The arctic was and remains remarkably desolate: Why botiier to explore it? One way to understand the arctic mania of the 1840-185Os is to compare to the of the 1950-196Os and the continuing role of space flight today. According to Roger Launius, chair of the American Space History Program at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), there were five reasons America began its manned space program: scientific discovery, economic possibilities, military security and applications, prestige, and survival of the species (the potential to inhabit other planets). Of these reasons, however, prestige was by far the greatest. The U.S. government created NASA in response to the Soviet Union's space program, which in 1957 rocketed to the forefront of the space race with the successful launching of the first satellite, Sputnik. Two years later they went farther, crash landing a payload on the moon. John F. Kennedy made space exploration a priority for his administration. In a 1961 speech he declared that the United States should commit itself to achieving the goal... of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth, and the Apollo space missions began soon after. They were a direct challenge to the Soviet Union, a bold promotion of American prestige, and every bit as dangerous and superfluous as any arctic adventure of the antebellum period. Launius noted that America continues its space program to this day because it raises our stature as a people, as a civilization, as a nation. That the U.S. space program is the best in the world is a sign of the nation's prestige: That's why we started flying them in 1961, and that's why, all other things being countervailing... we will not stop flying them now. He went on to note that in the twenty-first century, Nations that want to establish their credibility in the world, like China, are seeking to do this, in part, by flying astronauts.1 Prestige drove and continues to drive the exploration of space. Prestige, and to a lesser degree all the other reasons Launius listed, also fueled the drive for arctic exploration in the antebellum period and caused the United States to launch its own arctic exploring expedition in 1850. A brief history of arctic exploration is necessary to explain how a series of quixotic quests for a lost explorer and a mythical sea could create a sensation great enough to make Dr. Kane one of the foremost celebrities of his age. It is difficult to determine exactly when European exploration of the polar northwest began. Norse legend always included some notion of these lands, and archeological evidence shows that Scandinavian groups settled in Greenland and far-northern North America as early as the tenth century.2 The first modern exploration of the American arctic was by English explorer John Cabot. He traveled to present-day Newfoundland in 1496 and 1497, just four years after Columbus sailed to the New World. Cabot's son, Sebastian, capitalized on his father's discoveries by starting the Muscovy Company in Bristol, and as early as 1502, Bristol natives sailed to this new found land to catch and dry fish for export back to Europe.3 Martin Frobisher furthered arctic discovery by reaching Ellesmere Island and what is now called Frobisher Bay during a series of explorations in search of the Northwest Passage in 1576-1578. The British crown charged him to seek out gold and to his great joy he discovered and mined what seemed to be the legendary El Dorado: It was only upon his return to England that he learned that his tons of glistening cargo was fool's gold. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,172
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,396

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle