MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W267706274

Home Is Where the Heart Is: Sexual Orientation Discrimination and the Right to Adequate Housing in International Law

2009· article· en· W267706274 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dara Smith

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œGeorge Washington international law review · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDiscrimination and Equality Law
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSexual orientationLesbianHousing discriminationLawNorm (philosophy)International lawEthnic groupPolitical scienceTransgenderSociologyGender studies
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I. INTRODUCTION In 2006, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force reported that although only 3 to 5 percent of people in the United States are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transsexual (LGBT), 20 to 40 percent of homeless youths are LGBT individuals.1 In part, the report attributed this vasdy disproportionate rate within homelessness to pervasive discrimination against LGBT individuals in housing practices, including refusal to accept LGBT individuals even at temporary shelters.2 In fact, in recent years, watchdog groups in Canada, the United Kingdom, Brazil, South Africa, and the United States have documented similar and related problems.3 Although many state governments have attempted to address racial, ethnic, and wealth discrimination in housing, many of these governments have failed to explicitly deal with housing discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.4 Fortunately, international legal standards are increasingly addressing this issue. Recendy, more nations have begun to recognize both the human right to adequate housing and the need to treat sexual minorities as a protected group.5 Thus, international instruments mandating nondiscriminatory protection of the right to adequate housing should be construed to protect sexual minorities so as to recognize these emerging norms. In addition, to ensure consistent protection from housing discrimination, even nonparties to these instruments should recognize the existence of a customary norm of international law that includes sexual minorities among the groups protected from discrimination with regard to the right to adequate housing. Part II of this Note will discuss the sources and nature of the right to adequate housing in international law. It will examine the conventional sources and definitions of the right and describe the right to adequate housing within international custom. Part II also will focus on the prohibition against housing discrimination. In particular, it will discuss the source and meaning of the prohibition on discrimination as well as that prohibition's justiciability. Part II will finish by exploring the emergence of a customary norm recognizing sexual minorities as a group that should be protected from discrimination in general. Part III will argue further that, given the development of this norm, sexual minorities should be among the groups that international law protects from discrimination with respect to the right to adequate housing. II. DISCUSSION A. The Right to Adequate Housing in International Law The human right to adequate housing is well established under both conventional and customary international law. Many international instruments outline and create protections for the right to housing, including global multilateral treaties and regional international agreements. Furthermore, an increasingly strong principle of customary international law protects the right to adequate housing. 1. International Instruments Protecting the Right to Adequate Housing Global multilateral treaties provide the most comprehensive housing rights protections, while regional international instruments create an additional layer of protection and can be enforced effectively at a more local level.6 Both types of instruments are products of an international regime that strongly safeguards the right to adequate housing. a. Multilateral International Instruments Several major multilateral instruments recognize housing rights, creating the strongest and most broad-based protections for the right to housing and more clearly defining the right itself. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) , adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in 1948, explicitly states that [e]veryone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including . . . housing.7 Although the UDHR is not binding law, it was the first agreement expressing a unified group of nations' intent to protect economic, social, and cultural rights, including the right to housing. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,935
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,953

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,345
Écart entre enseignants0,314 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œGeorge Washington international law reviewMême sujetDiscrimination and Equality LawTravaux en français237 207