MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W267708815

Canada's Role in the United States' Oil and Gas Supply Security: Oil Sands, Arctic Gas, Nafta, and Canadian Kyoto Protocol Impacts

2004· article· en· W267708815 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alastair R. Lucas

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnergy law journal · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Policy and Governance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNatural gasOil sandsNatural resource economicsUnconventional oilInternational tradeEnergy policyEnergy securityPetroleum industryEconomicsEconomyFossil fuelEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental scienceRenewable energyEngineeringGeographyEnvironmental engineeringWaste management
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I. INTRODUCTION Canada is the United States' largest foreign supplier of oil, natural gas, and electricity. This includes 15% of gross oil imports and 14% of the total natural gas supply.1 Prospects for continuing and increasing these relatively secure energy supplies are strong in view of proposed major natural gas pipelines from the Arctic and continued development of Alberta's oil sands. The oil sands hold estimated reserves of 2.5 trillion barrels (bbls) with ultimate recoverable reserves of 315 billion bbls.2 However, there are several clouds on the horizon. One concern is the declining of the oil and natural gas reserves and production in the historically productive Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). A second concern is the regulatory and financial burdens and overall economic effects that Canada's December 2002 ratification of the Kyoto Protocol on greenhouse gas emissions reduction will have on the petroleum industry in general, and on future oil sands development, in particular. Regulatory uncertainty and investment chill are already observable, and lengthy and uncertain constitutional litigation between energy-producer provinces and the federal government is a possibility. A third concern is the potential cost and delay resulting from complex environmental regulation and the implications of aboriginal interests for the proposed Arctic natural gas pipelines. The final concern is the growing unease of the Canadian public about the long-term national energy supply in view of the energy trade provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and developing United States North American energy policies. These issues will be assessed. First however, Canada's oil and natural gas reserves, supply, and export potential will be reviewed. Attention will be given the massive unconventional oil reserves represented by the bitumen deposits of the oil sands. II. CANADIAN OIL AND GAS SUPPLY A. Oil The WCSB, located primarily in the province of Alberta, has been the principal source of conventional oil, i.e., light crude (density 900 Kg/m^sup 3^). Minor producing areas include Ontario, the Newfoundland Grand Banks, the Scotian Shelf, and the Northern Frontier region. Figure 1 shows the location of these producing areas and includes the location of oil sands deposits that are discussed below.3 In its 1999 report, Canadian Energy: Supply and Demand 2025, the National Energy Board (NEB) estimated conventional crude oil resources to be 34 billion cubic metres (m^sup 3^) of original oil-in-place, of which about 9.2 billion m^sup 3^ (27 percent) is estimated be ultimately recoverable.4 B. Western Canada Sedimentary Basin Eighty-two percent of the estimated 3.6 billion m^sup 3^ of ultimately recoverable light crude reserves in the WCSB have been discovered, and of these, 23% remain as established reserves and future improved recovery reserves. Similarly, [f]or conventional heavy oil, some 1.1 billion m^sup 3^ (82 percent) of the estimated ultimate recoverable resources have been discovered, and of these discovered resources, 0.5 billion m^sup 3^ (50 percent) remain in the established reserves and the future improved recovery [reserves].6 This is clearly a portrait of a relatively mature production basin. Remaining WCSB established reserves are in decline as shown by Figure 2.7 While the number of producing wells has increased, crude oil production has declined as shown by Figure 3.8 The Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (AEUB) has documented the decline in average well productivity. In 2001, approximately half of the oil wells produced less than 2 m^sup 3^/day per well. These 16,100 wells operated at an average rate of 1 m^sup 3^/day and produced only 13% of total Alberta crude oil.9 C. Arctic and East Coast Offshore Frontier Areas By contrast, there is considerable reserve potential in the relatively unexplored frontier areas. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,096
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,698

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,006
Communication savante0,0110,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnergy law journalMême sujetCanadian Policy and GovernanceTravaux en français237 207