Diane Gerin-Lajoie. Youth, Language, and Identity: Portraits of Students from English-Language High Schools in the Montreal Area
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Diane Gerin-Lajoie. Youth, Language, and Identity: Portraits of Students from English-Language High Schools in the Montreal Area. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press Inc., 2011. 215 pp. References. $34.95 sc. Diane Gerin-Lajoie, a sociologist of education, is a professor at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) at the University of Toronto. Her book, Youth, Language, and Identity: Portraits of Students from English-Language High Schools in the Montreal Area, is a critical examination of identity construction among English minority-language youth in Montreal, Quebec. The book is based on a three-year study at two English-language high schools in the Montreal area, as well as her previous work on Francophone minority identity in Ontario. The book contains eight chapters. The first part of chapter 1 includes a theoretical framework. Working within a postmodern understanding of the notion of identity, Gerin-Lajoie views identity as complex, fluid, and influenced by the power relations in which social practices take place. However, the theoretical framework appears to be a hit weak as the author claims to adopt a postmodern perspective of identity, but could have included postmodern theorists such as Bourdieu's (1977, 1991) work on power, Weedon's (1997) work on subjectivity, Butler's (1990)'s work on performativity, and Bhabha's (1994) work on identity as a positioning to strengthen the theoretical discussion. The second part of this chapter presents a methodological framework. Multiple forms of data were collected, including a brief survey questionnaire, ethnographic observations, interviews with eight high school students, friends, their families, teachers, and administrators. Chapter 2 presents a brief overview of the social and educational contexts of Quebec's official English language minority and a description of the school settings in which the study was conducted. Since the Quiet Revolution of the 1960s, Quebec's Anglophone community has changed from a community with majority status to a community with minority status. In 1974, French became the official language of Quebec and in 1976, Bill 101 made French the language used in the public sphere in Quebec. In education, prior to the 1960s, all parents in Quebec could choose the language in which their children were educated. After the 1960s, many children of immigrants were enrolled in English-language schools because the Montreal Catholic school system was reluctant to admit students who were not Francophones. Chapter 3 examines the results of the survey that was administered to the Grade 9 students at Schools A and B. The sample consisted of a total of 106 students, 30 of whom were from School A and 76 of whom were from School B. Through the survey, the author gathered information on the language practices of these students, in particular the way in which they used English, French, and other languages in their daily lives. The survey results reveal that at School A, the majority language, (French) is much more spoken in the halls and classrooms than at School B, where French is spoken in French classes. This survey is then compared with another survey in her previous study on Francophone youth in Ontario. The students in the Montreal area who were surveyed had better access to public services in their own language than did Francophone students in Ontario. Chapters 4 and 5 sketch identity portraits of the participants in the study, three students in School A and five students in School B. The youths' portraits are uniformly structured. For each participant, these identity portraits document experiences in three specific areas that had an impact on their identity construction: family, school, and friends, followed by a section on language and identity and a short conclusion. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».