Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Drs Andrews and Mahoney have created an affordable, practical resource, which is essential reading for consulting paediatricians and child psychiatrists in academic or hospital centres who perform developmental assessments. It will also be a welcome resource for primary care clinicians (including community office-based paediatricians, family physicians and nurse practitioners) who provide comprehensive care to families with school-aged children. The authors are expert developmental paediatricians from across Canada who are completely familiar with the Canadian medical system and can point the reader to the best options for providing advice to parents who have children with school issues. The Children with School Problems manual is very easy to read, with chapters organized in a logical fashion that are divided into five main sections (Foundations, Diagnostics, Management, Trajectories, Resources). There is a wealth of information including a glossary of medical terms and conditions. A full section of tables of risk factors and clinical signs includes details regarding physical examination findings. Updated information regarding medical drug treatment for conditions that can impact school performance such as ADHD is included. A detailed list of Canadian norms and options for complementary and alternative therapies will be very useful for families who request this information. A detailed collection of clinical tools required for clinical assessments is included in this excellent resource. The index is comprehensive and provides a quick way to find details that a clinician requires during a busy day in the office. The editors and authors of this revised second edition manual have updated the content providing excellent information about child developmental trajectories and risk factors that can interfere with school performance. Detailed information about the impact of social determinants of health, alcohol, nicotine, other substances and poor nutrition are provided. Detailed description of school staff and procedures will ensure that the final assessment and evidence-based recommendations will be appropriate for the Canadian school system. The clinical case studies are very helpful in illustrating how to suggest recommendations for the school administrative team and teachers to follow. A Resource Worksheet is provided for physicians who work with students with learning problems to enable collection of essential information in a practical summary format. The Editors and Authors have updated the original 1998 version of the manual and added new research evidence about treatment options. On a personal note, the first edition of this manual assisted me when my own child experienced serious school problems, so I can personally endorse this excellent resource manual as a parent and as a family physician with an interest in healthy child development.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».