Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Anthony Hippisley and Evgenija Luk'janova, compilers. Simeon Polockij's Library: A Catalogue. Koln, Weimer, Wien: Bohlau Verlag, 2005. vii, 226 pp. 11 illustrations. Euro 34.90/SFr 60.40.Habent sua fata liberi says the Latin proverb. There is much truth in this statement. Books are written, circulated, bought, sold, forgotten, destroyed. If we are fortunate, books are preserved to document the development of a culture or the formation of a significant figure in the history of a given culture or epoch. more temporally distant the epoch the more difficult it is to state with certainty exactly which books were available to a given cultural or historical personage and this makes research into his or her formation and oeuvre extremely difficult. While we have extensive surviving libraries of such modern writers as Gor'kij, Tolstoy, and Pushkin, we are generally not so fortunate as regards their contemporaries, and even less fortunate with writers from earlier periods.The case of Simeon Polockij is perhaps a unique exception. It has long boon known that his library has survived largely intact, the major portion being preserved in the Synodal Typography Library (Sinodal'naja tipografskaja hibliuteka) housed in the Russian State Archive of Ancient Documents (Rossijskaja Gosudarstvennyj arxiv drevnix aktov, RGADA) and in the State Historical Museum Synodal Collection (Gosudarstvennyj istoricheskij muzej, GIM, Sinodal'noe sobranie) While inventories of the collection were done in 1689 and 1718 and these were published in 1853 and 1864 respectively, it is only now with the under review that we have a full and accurate catalog and meticulous description of the imprints contained in the collection. is a work which opens a window not only on the intellectual world of Simeon and his friend and heir Sylvester Medvedev, but on the culture of Moscow based Westernizers of the period 1664-1689.This painstakingly detailed work, compiled on the basis of an in situ examination by the joint efforts of Anthony Hippisley, the recently retired Reader in Russian at St Andrews University in Edinburgh, Scotland and Evgenija Luk'janova, Librarian at RGADA, is a model of thoroughness and industry. Its modest size (226 pages of text) is far outweighed by its scholarly significance. It consists of three chapters and three appendices.Chapter 1, The Personal Library of Simeon serves as an introduction to the whole. authors delineate the scope of the and discuss the so-called i.e. the 1689 inventory as published by I.E. Zabelin in 1853 and the 1718 inventory known as Knigi v sunduke published by M.P. Poludenskij in 1864. In outlining The scope of this book the author (presumably Hippisley) notes that the collection is not just that of Polockij alone (who signed his name on some sixty out of the 603 imprints in the collection), but also that of his alter ego Sylvester Medvedev, who inherited the library after Simeon's death in 1680, added to it, and whose name was inscribed on all the items in the collection by the clerks compiling the 1689 inventory.Hippisley notes that the starting point for his research was the manuscript versions of the two inventories together with their published versions and the published catalog of the Synodal Typography Library, as well as articles by S.R. Dolgova, Anthony Hippisley, and M.A. Jusim. He further notes that the catalog includes only the non-Slavonic books owned by Polockij and Medvedev, excluding Slavonic printed books in the collection and any manuscripts owned or created by Polockij, as well as any non-Slavonic manuscripts found in the 1680 inventory. Hc also briefly outlines the history of the collection after the hapless Medvedev's execution in 1689. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».