MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2693861306 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.4877.4877

Transformation in Pre-Treatment Presentations of Gaucher Disease during the First Two Decades of Imiglucerase Enzyme Replacement Therapy: A Report from the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry

2016· article· en· W2693861306 sur OpenAlexaff
Pramod K. Mistry, Neal J. Weinreb, Julie L. Batista, Hans C. Andersson, Manisha Balwani, Thomas Andrew Burrow, Joel Charrow, Paige Kaplan, Priya S. Kishnani, Edwin H. Kolodny, Barry E. Rosenbloom, C. Ronald Scott

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineEnzyme replacement therapySplenectomyCohortBone painAvascular necrosisPediatricsInternal medicineSurgeryDiseaseSpleenFemoral head

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract We hypothesized that the prevalence of clinical manifestations of Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) at the time of treatment initiation has changed since alglucerase/imiglucerase enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) was approved in the United States (US) in 1991. US alglucerase/imiglucerase-treated GD1 patients (N=1,427) from the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00358943, sponsored by Sanofi Genzyme) as of March 4, 2016 were stratified by age at ERT initiation: n=399 pediatric patients (<18 years); n=689 adults 18 to <50 years; n=339 adults ≥50 years. Pre-treatment demographics and splenectomy status were analyzed by 4 eras of ERT initiation (1991-1995, 1996-2000, 2001-2005, 2006-2009) and age at ERT initiation. Bone manifestations (avascular necrosis [AVN], infarction, bone crises, bone pain), hematologic parameters (platelet count, hemoglobin concentration), and liver volume were analyzed by age cohort, era of ERT initiation, and splenectomy status prior to beginning ERT, using the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or analysis of variance (ANOVA) as appropriate. Spleen volume for patients who had intact spleens prior to starting ERT was analyzed by age cohort and era of ERT initiation using ANOVA. The most striking difference between early and later time periods was the reduced prevalence of splenectomy across all age groups (p ≤0.0001). Splenectomized patients collapsed across eras presented with a significantly higher prevalence of AVN (p < 0.0001), infarctions (p <0.01), bone crises (p <0.0001), and bone pain (p <0.0001) than non-splenectomized patients in all 3 age groups. Prevalence of AVN (p <0.05), infarction (p<0.05), and bone crises (p<0.01) were significantly lower in later eras in the non-splenectomized pediatric group. Both the splenectomized and non-splenectomized groups of adults aged 18 to <50 years experienced a significantly lower prevalence of AVN (p <0.05), infarction (p <0.05), and bone crises (p <0.05). Infarctions were significantly less prevalent in non-splenectomized adults aged ≥50 years (p <0.05). Bone pain remained a prevalent symptom and was not significantly different across the eras for each age group. Differences were not observed in hematologic parameters. Hepatosplenomegaly remained a prevalent symptom at pre-treatment presentation across the eras, although spleen volumes for those with intact spleens were significantly lower in later eras for children and adults aged 18 to <50 years (p <0.01). Also of note, the interval between the median age at diagnosis and the initiation of imiglucerase ERT decreased in later eras; the most striking change was observed in children. Compared with patients who started treatment when ERT was first introduced, patients now tend to have a less severe GD1 phenotype and fewer irreversible manifestations of GD1 when starting treatment. Disclosures Mistry: Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Weinreb:Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire HGT: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Batista:Sanofi Genzyme: Employment. Andersson:Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Balwani:Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Burrow:Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire HGT: Honoraria; ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Charrow:Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy; Shire HGT: Research Funding; BioMarin: Research Funding; Amicus Therapeutics: Research Funding; The National Gaucher Foundation: Speakers Bureau; Fabry Support & Information Group: Speakers Bureau; ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kaplan:Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genetic Counselors: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Khan:ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire HGT: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cytonet LLC: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Actelion: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kishnani:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire HGT: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amicus Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Valerion Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; National Institutes of Health: Research Funding; FDA: Research Funding; Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: Research Funding; ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pompe Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kolodny:Shire HGT: Consultancy; ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenbloom:Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scott:Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding; ICGG Gaucher Registry (Sanofi Genzyme sponsored): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,292 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchTravaux en français237 207