MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W270260530

Handbook of Developmental Disabilities.

2010· article· en· W270260530 sur OpenAlex
Senthil Damodharan

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed Central · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPaceConstruct (python library)Meaning (existential)Intervention (counseling)PsychologyEthnic groupDevelopmental psychologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

“It takes a village to raise a child.” The famous African proverb has a greater meaning to the lives of developmentally disabled individuals. This is not surprising as developmental disability affects various aspects of human intellectual and physical development, and disabled individuals require a range of expertise at different ages depending on the developmental and adaptive challenges faced by them. The sheer breadth of the subject matter relevant to developmental disabilities and pace of knowledge explosion in each subspeciality has made it impossible to single-handedly keep abreast of advances in all related fields. This handbook is a useful addition to a growing list of texts covering the breadth of the field. The editors have organised the book into eight sections. It starts off with ‘Foundations’ and the editors define the construct of developmental disabilities in the first chapter in a pragmatic manner. The impact of race, colour and ethnicity in United States (US) educational practice is well covered in a separate chapter and will resonate with Canadian readers working with similar populations. The book progresses to sections titled Issues in Health, Genetics & Neuroscience, Early Intervention, School-Age Education & Intervention, Post-school & Adult Issues, Behavior Supports, Family Issues, and finally signs off with a section on International Perspectives and Future Directions. This is a worthwhile read, although the unevenness in writing styles and approach to the topics in its thirty chapters make it difficult in parts, which is an inescapable aspect of a multi-authored text. Although the focus appears to be primarily on policies and practices in the US, the principles can be translated to other systems and settings. As a psychiatrist I was keen to read the chapters related to psychiatric disorders and psychopharmacology. The chapter on psychiatric issues is impressive in its overview of the subject, including current evidence and issues related to diagnostic and treatment issues, and service delivery. The next chapter, ‘Psychotherapeutic Medications and Positive Behavior Support (PBS)’, articulates the concept of psychotropic medications impacting on the behavioural mechanisms that mediate challenging behaviours, providing a meaningful framework to conceptualize the role of medications within the framework of functional analysis and positive behaviour support (PBS). The field of PBS, which changed the behavioural treatment approaches for individuals with developmental disabilities and challenging behaviours, lost a pioneer academician and clinician recently, the late Edward G. Carr. The clarity of his writing, his masterful summary of the evolving field, and humility in acknowledging the limitations of PBS make the chapter he co-authors on the topic in this text a wonderful read. I particularly enjoyed the chapters on early intervention. With increasing research and programmatic focus in this area, this section is a must read for policy makers to avoid problems that plague the delivery of early intervention services in the real world, as passionately articulated by Carl Dunst (pages 161–180). The fourteen chapters included in the sections ‘School-age Education and Intervention’, ‘Post school and Adult Issues’ and ‘Family Issues’ are succinctly written, provide clear summaries of the current evidence base, and outline implications for practitioners, policy makers, and researchers. Practitioners will find useful ideas and practices to advocate for their patients and to inform program development and delivery. The issues highlighted and discussed in these chapters bring into sharp focus the importance of life-span services and programs for individuals with developmental disabilities. Supportive public policies have a profound impact on lived experience. For example, a focus on providing accessible public spaces and facilities can have a transformative effect on the experience of physical disability in daily life. Policies are invariably affected by the prevailing politico-economic climate and persuasions. The chapter on the impact and evolution of public policies in the US, discussed using a framework of ‘core concepts’, is one of the best chapters in the book. The authors of the chapter on international perspectives should be congratulated for their erudite discussion on the priorities and issues affecting the lives of people with developmental disability living in developing parts of the globe where the majority of the human population lives. The chapter titled ‘General Health’ is rambling and could have benefited from a tighter editorial direction and scrutiny, and I thought the chapter ‘Neuroscience’ was a missed opportunity due to lack of focus. The chapter titled ‘Genetics’ will appeal to clinicians. The chapters on research and the suggestions for further research contained in various chapters might whet the appetite of researchers in this field. The book is recommended for departmental and hospital libraries.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle