MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W270488008

Mara Feeney. Rankin Inlet

2008· article· en· W270488008 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Emőke J. E. Szathmáry

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian ethnic studies · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPopulationHistoryArcticGeographyGenealogySociologyOceanographyDemographyGeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Mara Feeney. Rankin Inlet. Fiddletown, CA: Gaby Press, 2009. 252 pp. $17.95 U.S. sc. Mara Feeney first experienced Canadian Arctic as an undergraduate anthropology student. Later she worked in Inuit communities around Hudson Bay, and eventually moved south. Almost forty years after her initial stay with an Inuit family, she published a novel set in Rankin Inlet that details building of a new life and family. That story is intertwined with transformation of a culture and birth of a new Canadian territory: Our Land, or Nunavut, in Inuktitut. Feeney's focus is Alison, a young nurse-midwife from Liverpool, England, who moves to Canadian Arctic after graduation. Shortly thereafter, she marries an Inuk hunter in Rankin Inlet, and there they remain to raise their family. Alison's story unfolds through dated diary entries, letters, and e-mail, written by her and a multi-generational cast of characters, comprised primarily of her extended family. It is enriched by internal narrative of Alison's father-in-law, Nikmak, whose style remains true to his oral tradition. Feeney uses Inuktitut expressions throughout novel, and she provides a pronunciation guide as well as a glossary. The novel is organized into sections called Keewatin, Transitions, and Kivalliq. Until 1999, Keewatin, meaning wind in Cree, was a district of Northwest Territories encompassing mainland north of Manitoba, as well as islands of Hudson, James, and Ungava Bays. Its population was largely Inuit, but its legal name was drawn from language of a sometime enemy. Keewatin opens on March 15, 1970 with a diary entry made by a young, English nurse-midwife. She has severed her ties to her working-class family and their Roman Catholic faith, but retains a link to her youngest sister. Set to depart from Liverpool, Alison writes that her diary may be the record of a Grand Adventure, as many Brits and Scots have had before me--the ones with dim futures at home who signed on as traders or missionaries to explore arctic (3). The section ends just eight months later, but by then we are grounded in characters' personal histories, as well as sociocultural fabric of their lives. Feeney orchestrates her characters' voices by varying number of their entries. In Keewatin, Alison's commentaries exceed all others. She is alienated by behaviour of some outsiders working in or visiting Rankin Inlet, and she is baffled by incongruity manifest as traditional Inuit selectively adopt outsiders' ways. A longing for meaningful connection and a lively curiosity propel Alison towards the other. She encounters Ivaluk, and their attraction is mutual. Ivaluk's letters to his adopted brother, Thomasie, who is at school in south, detail pleasures and pains of settlement life, focussing more on public than on domestic domains. Though he writes in English, Ivaluk signs his name with Inuit syllabics. Alison's and Ivaluk's passages telegraph their growth individually and as a couple, but Nikmak's contemplation is more complex. The eleven stories he tells his daughter, as she lies dying in nursing station, not only show his humanity, but they also conjure up Inuit past. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,755
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,294
Tête enseignante GPT0,463
Écart entre enseignants0,169 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian ethnic studiesMême sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207