Defect-based Condition Assessment Model of Railway infrastructure
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Railway infrastructure, such as rails, ballasts, sleepers, etc., condition should be always monitored and analyzed to ensure safety and quality of the ride for both passengers and freight. Railway infrastructure has various components from different materials which make it hard to assess and monitor its condition. The majority of the existing conditions assessment models are limited either in terms of components or techniques, many models focus on the assessment of the track geometry condition depending on only the data collected from the track recording cars and a few condition assessment models to evaluate the structural condition of the railway infrastructure. Other developed models take into consideration one component or focus in utilizing one inspection technique. Therefore, the development of a comprehensive condition assessment tool that covers the numerous railway infrastructure components and the different inspection techniques is needed to ensure the safety and the quality of the service for the public. \nThe objective of this research is to develop a defect-based condition assessment model of Railway infrastructure. This model aims to cover the structural and geometrical defects that are associated with the different components of railway infrastructure. The railway infrastructure was divided into five main components rails, sleepers (Ties), ballast, track geometry and insulated rail joints, for each component their defects were collected and categorized. Two main inputs have been used to develop the model, firstly the relative importance weights of the components, Defect Categories, and defects, secondly the defects severities. To obtain the relative importance weights the Analytic Network Process (ANP) model was adopted, ANP covers the interdependencies between the components and their defects. Fuzzification technique was used to uniform all the different defects criteria and to translate the linguistic condition assessment grading scale to a numerical score. Furthermore, the Weighted Sum Mean was used to integrate both the weights and severities to define the conditions and to evaluate the overall condition of the railway infrastructure. The data utilized in this research was obtained from railway condition classification manuals, previous research, and questionnaires distributed to professionals in Canada. The fruit of this fusion was also presented in a user-friendly automated tool using excel. The developed model was implemented in two case studies from Ontario, Canada. The model outputs and the decision made for the case studies were compared and the model gave a similar condition. This model helps in minimizing the inaccuracy of railway condition assessment through the application of severity, uncertainty mitigation, and robust aggregation. It also benefits asset managers by providing detailed condition of the Railway infrastructure, the condition of the components, defect categories and an overall condition for maintenance, rehabilitation, and budget allocation purposes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».