MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W270606572

Perceived Disparities in Access to Health Care Due to Cost for Women with Disabilities

2009· article· en· W270606572 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diane L. Smith, Maribeth S. Ruiz

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of rehabilitation · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueHealthcare Policy and Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealth careWheelchairPopulationBusinessService providerMedicineUniversal designPublic healthNursingFamily medicineService (business)Environmental healthMarketingPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Individuals with disabilities tend to have more health care access problems, have secondary health conditions, have unmet health care needs, and are less likely to be satisfied with medical care than those without disabilities (Batavia, 1995; Hagglund, Clark, Conforti, & Shigaki, 1999). With nearly 20% of the US population with one or more disabilities, there is a great need to address the barriers that prevent this population from accessing the health care services, such as physician services, that they require (US Bureau of Census, 2006). Scheer, Kroll, Neri and Beatty (2003) defined three broad categories of barriers to health care services: environmental, structural, and process. Environmental barriers include issues of office accessibility, such as parking, entry, restrooms, waiting rooms, examination rooms, and diagnostic equipment. Physician's offices have been noted to lack equipment and space essential for treatment of patients using wheelchairs. Many offices are without adequate room to maneuver a wheelchair, use examination tables that are too high, and do not have sit-in scales (DeJong, 1997). Transportation barriers such as the lack of access to public transportation, publicly funded door-to door transportation, and taxicab services, also have an effect on the perceived accessibility of health care services (Scheer et al., 2003). Structural barriers refer to a lack of financial resources for necessary services. Process barriers relate to the delivery of service. For example, lack of provider knowledge and lack of timeliness of service are issues frequently reported by patients. Provider attitudes have also been cited as a barrier to accessing services (Au & Man, 2006) Cost as a Barrier to Health Care Access Addressing structural barriers specifically, Sheer and colleagues (2003) argue that limited health benefit programs, whether publicly or privately funded, may not provide for services such as physical and occupational therapy, high quality and well-fitted functional durable medical equipment, and mental health services. In addition, a considerable proportion of people with disabilities report serious problems accessing prescription drugs (32%), dental care (29%), equipment (21%), mental health services (17%), and home care (16%) due to cost (Kennedy & Erb, 2002; Schultz, Shenkin, & Horowitz, 1998). Barriers to Physician Services for Women with Disabilities There is a limited but growing body of research focused on health care disparities faced by women with disabilities. According to a study by Parish and Huh (2006), women with disabilities experience poorer health and preventive care than women without disabilities. Results of this study revealed that 19 percent of women with disabilities postponed such care compared with the 8 percent of women without disabilities. Additionally, 20 percent of women with disabilities postponed getting needed medications compared to 6 percent of women without disabilities A study by Parish and Ellison-Martin (2007) examined a national sample of low-income female Medicaid recipients and found that despite having similar potential for care (i.e., health insurance, usual source of care, and having a physician as a usual source of care) compared to women without disabilities, women with disabilities had substantially worse rates of receiving medical care and medication when they were needed. In a study utilizing a national publicly available dataset, Smith (2008) found that women with disabilities had less access to health care than women without disabilities and men with disabilities. Chevarley, Theirry, Gill, Ryerson, and Nosek (2006) found that women with three or more functional limitations were more likely to report being unable to get general medical care, dental care, prescription medicines, or eyeglasses compared to women without functional limitations. The primary reason cited for being unable to receive general care were financial problems or limitations in insurance. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,692
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,331

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,291 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of rehabilitationMême sujetHealthcare Policy and ManagementTravaux en français237 207