MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W271836210 · doi:10.1177/153660060502700105

Katinka Dániel and Her Contributions to Kodály Pedagogy in the United States

2005· article· en· W271836210 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Historical Research in Music Education · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueBalkan and Eastern European Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSymphonyPianoMusic educationCurriculumVocational educationBartokMusicalPsychologyPedagogyVisual artsHistoryArtArt history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Beginning with her work in Budapest, Hungary, and continuing in the United States and Canada, Katinka Scipiades Daniel (b. 1913) has been involved with the Kodaly concept of music education for over sixty years. (1) A tireless educator and reformer, she has been a pioneer in curriculum development and music literacy for children and adults since her immigration to the United States in 1960. Her work, and that of her students, has changed the course of music education and given rise to Kodaly organizations and teacher training programs in colleges and universities throughout the United States. Daniel was born and raised in Hungary. Her formal musical training began at age five in Budapest at the Liszt Ferenc Zenemuveszeti Foiskola (Franz Liszt Music Academy), Preparatory Division. Admission to the preparatory program was by audition, and lessons were given twice a week. The students attended many concerts, not only of pianists, but also of other soloists and ensembles such as vocalists and symphony orchestras. Daniel credits her rich experiences at the academy and in her home for her lifelong interest in music. (2) For the two piano preparatory levels, Daniel studied with Istvan Thoman, who had also taught Erno Dohnanyi and Bela Bartok. Thoman supervised the lessons given by a student teacher at the academy. After completing the preparatory division, Daniel continued to study piano at the Music Academy throughout her elementary and high school years. Hungarian students entering the Gymnasium, or high school, choose either a vocational or classical course of study and are admitted by passing exams in the subject area. Daniel's father encouraged her to study elementary education in order to earn a living. Because of the rigors of the Gymnasium, she had only one year of study to complete her elementary education degree from the Notre Dame Teachers College in Pecs, Hungary. She then studied music education at the Franz Liszt Academy and was awarded the degree in 1932. As she continued her study at the Franz Liszt Academy, Daniel planned for a career as a concert pianist, having the security of two education degrees as her father suggested. She studied the next six years for a degree in piano performance, graduating in 1938. Although Daniel did not become a concert artist as she had planned, her training was thorough and rigorous. She describes one of her first lessons as follows: When I went to my first chamber music class, I was prepared to play a trio by Mozart. When it was my turn to begin, Professor Weiner asked me if I knew all the Mozart trios. I humbly answered that I did not. He told me, Go back home and learn all of them so as to truly know Mozart. Then, come back and I will tell you which one to play! Without question this is what I did. (3) When Daniel graduated in 1938 with her piano performance degree, Antal Molnar, her solfege and theory professor at the academy, asked what her plans were. She told him of her desire to begin a concert career. The professor advised her to consider continuing her education because there would be little chance during the war for a successful performance career. Daniel applied for a music teaching position in the public schools and began pursuing an advanced degree from the Pazmany Peter University in Budapest. Because of the public school schedule, Daniel attended class at the university in the morning. During the afternoon she taught solfege and piano in the Szekes Fovarosi Zene Iskola [Municipal Music Schools] in Budapest and general music classes in the Budapest City Schools. She also maintained a private piano studio in her home. In 1943 Katinka married Dr. Erno Daniel, professor of piano at the Franz Liszt Music Academy. The wedding party included Dr. Erno Dohnanyi, conductor, pianist, composer, and then president of the Liszt Academy, and Ede Zathoreczky, violinist and later successor to Dohnanyi as president of the academy. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,269
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,300

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,160
Tête enseignante GPT0,409
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle