MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W271859765

Contesting Patriarchy: Granddaughters Fight Back

2007· article· en· W271859765 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueForum on public policy · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPatriarchyGender studiesPolitical scienceHuman rightsHegemonyLawColonialismOppressionSociologyPolitics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract This paper argues that colonial policies discriminating against Native women, as well as defining and circumscribing Native rights and identity, continue to cast a long shadow over the cultural and socio-economic landscape on First Nations Reserves in Canada. The study historicizes the emergence of these discriminatory practices on the Six Nations Reserve, entailing the transformation of Native social organization from a matriarchy to a reification of patriarchy, subordinating Six Nations women and denying them their human rights, if they chose to marry non-Natives. Banished from their homes and families, constrained from participating in Six Nations culture, women continue to suffer under this yoke of oppression that has been naturalized through the hegemony of internal colonialism and meted out according to Canadian statutory law, codified in the Indian Act. The narrative describes several signal cases that posed legal challenges to discrimination, the intervention of the United Nations to protect Native women's cultural autonomy, as well as the internal Canadian political struggle over reform, women's rights and the movement for Native self-government. As Native women continue to struggle against the patriarchal mentality and colonization of consciousness evidenced by their leaders, First Nations communities are attempting to determine their own codes of citizenship, define their own cultural identities and design new indigenous institutions to meet the challenges of the twenty-first century, to ensure the continuation of our Native cultures. Introduction St. Edmund's Hall houses a portrait of a Mohawk Indian, known as Oronhyatekha, (Burning Sky), who was invited to come to study here in Oxford by the Prince of Wales in the late nineteenth-century. He traveled from his home on the Six Nations Reserve in Canada and became a physician. Oronhyatekha was called a Red Indian and he was depicted in full Iroquois attire, far different than his dress in nineteenth-century Canadian society. His name, in English, was Peter Martin and he was my great-grandfather's brother. The reserve in Oronhyatekha's lifetime was a poor, rural agricultural community. Canadian colonial policy proffered assimilation and enfranchisement, as an incentive for First Nations people to leave the Reserve and become members of the Euro-Canadian society. Oronhyatekha, however, was proud of his identity as a Mohawk and he resisted being defined in any way, but as an Indian. Oronhyatekha was named a national historic figure in Canada, last August. Today the reserve is no longer a simple farming community, but home to businesses, a bank and a population of approximately 26,000. Almost 11,000 Band members live off-reserve. (1) Many people seek to live on the reserve now, not only to retain their sense of Native culture, but also to partake of socio-economic benefits. Native identity, since Oronhyatekha came to study in Oxford, has become much more complicated and contested, for these entitlements are yoked to Indian status. Native leaders and communities have become invested in and protective of their membership and rights as status Indians. Indian status in Canada is a complex political and social construct. Canadian legislation naturalized gender discrimination and enshrined patriarchy by altering the basic organization of most Indian groups, such as Six Nations. Many Indian women were literally disinherited and disavowed as Indians in this process. For over one hundred years, Native women, not only from my reserve, but also from all over Canada, were denied their identity as Indians, through Canadian statutory law. The laws were embedded in the Indian Act, defining an Indian and a Band with reference to Canadian mores, not in Native terms. Through political pressure and court rulings, these laws were challenged as discriminatory. Women's rights were partially restored in 1985, through a Bill entitled, C-31. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,890
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle