How Green are Romania’s Cities? A Quarter - Century of Green Area Policy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cities, on a highly basic level, comprise of functional areas, such as: residential areas, industrial areas, transport areas, service areas, green areas etc.Even though they are often mentioned at the end of most enumerations, case in point, green areas and parks in particular are crucial for the proper growth and development of any city on the planet.However, the intention of this paper is not to present the merits of such spaces but rather to focus on how these urban open spaces have evolved in time.Our analysis will be limited to the period between 1993 and 2015 and will use Romania as case study.More specifically, the paper will examine how urban planning and legislative policies have influenced the evolution of green areas, essentially what happened after the collapse of the planned economy, the socialist regime and the top-down planning practice and with the emergence of a more aggressive urban development and a market real estate economy.The analysis will include Bucharest (Romania's capital city) and the 41 county seats. THEORY AND METHODOLOGYWith urban population exceeding 50% of the world population and expected to increase to 66% by 2050, the quantity and quality of green spaces in urban areas have become key elements for sustaining the quality of human life in urban areas.Thus, the study and research of green areas and their role in the well-being of cities and its citizens has become not only of chief interest for scientists and urban theoreticians, but also urgent for local authorities and communities.Reviewing the more recent scientific literature on the matter, one can observe two main research streams when it comes to the study of green areas: 1. the influence of such spaces on different aspects of urban life and 2. the territorial dynamics of green areas.The former path includes, for instance, the study conducted by Morancho ( 2003) who found a Centre for Research on Settlements and Urbanism Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning J o u r n a l h o m e p a g e: http://jssp.reviste.ubbcluj.roGreen areas are one of the most essential -but more often than not overlooked by planners, officials, and local governmentsfunctional parts of a city.This paper examines the evolution of such zones in 42 of the most important urban areas of Romania (the county capital cities) focusing on two years, 1993 and 2015.Furthermore, the paper links the evolution of green area developments to different legislative policies and planning practices that emerged after the fall of communism and the emergence of capitalism in this part of Europe.We conclude that the apparent expansion of green areas masks an unfortunate and somewhat dangerous situation, as a quarter of a century of territorial, regional, and local planning has failed to create not only good public green areas, but also enough square meters compared to built areas.Solutions can be found in improving the existing legislation and implementing new, more steadfast urban development schemes that put green areas at their very core.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».