Characterization of Bleeding in Hemophilia Carriers and Comparison to Women with Type 1 Von Willebrand Disease, Type 3 Von Willebrand Disease Obligate Carriers and Controls
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Hemophilia carriers report abnormal bleeding, even when factor VIII or IX levels are normal. Information comparing bleeding events between carriers and women with other inherited bleeding disorders is lacking. Purpose: The purpose of our study was to characterize bleeding in hemophilia carriers using the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) and to compare it with bleeding in normal controls, women with Type 1 VWD and Type 3 VWD obligate carriers (OC). Method: This was a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study performed by members of GEHEP (Global Emerging HEmostasis Panel). Study participants were recruited from GEHEP members' clinics in North America (Kingston, Canada, Detroit and Philadelphia, USA), Europe (Malaga, Spain; Milan, Italy; Munich, Germany; Oslo, Norway) and South Africa (Johannesburg). Potential participants were identified through local patient databases and approached during clinic visits. All participants signed informed consent. Hemophilia carriers were defined by a documented FVIII or FIX mutation and/or by an appropriate family history (daughter of a man with hemophilia or mother of two sons with hemophilia or mother of one son with hemophilia with at least one other affected male relative). Demographic information was collected using a CRF and the ISTH-BAT was completed for each participant by study personnel. Existing ISTH-BAT data for women with Type 1 VWD, Type 3 VWD OC and age-matched female controls were used for comparison. Results: A total of 329 participants were included in this study; 168 hemophilia carriers, 83 women with Type 1 VWD, 32 Type 3 VWD OC and 46 female normal controls. Hemophilia carriers and normal controls were similar in age (40.1 vs 41.6, p=0.445). The mean overall ISTH-BAT bleeding score (BS) was significantly higher in carriers than in controls (5.7 vs 2.48, p<0.0001). Carriers reported significantly more bleeding in the categories of cutaneous, minor wounds, oral cavity bleeding, post-dental bleeding, surgical bleeding, menorrhagia, post-partum bleeding and other when compared with controls. Carriers were older than Type 1 VWD patients (40.1 vs 36.4 years, p=0.042). While women with Type 1 VWD had higher total ISTH-BAT BS (8.7 vs 5.7, p<0.0001) as well as higher scores for epistaxis, cutaneous bleeding, minor wounds, oral cavity bleeding and menorrhagia, hemophilia carriers had significantly higher scores for muscle hematomas and hemarthrosis. Carriers were younger than Type 3 VWD OC (40.1 vs 45.2 years, p = 0.02), had higher overall ISTH-BAT BS (5.7 vs 3.0, p=0.009) and reported more bleeding in the following categories: total score, epistaxis, hematuria, dental, muscle hematomas, hemarthrosis, and other. In fact, hemophilia carriers reported more musculoskeletal bleeding than all other groups. Importantly, given the concern about over-reporting of joint bleeds by hemophilia carriers because of familiarity with hemarthrosis in affected male relatives, no Type 3 VWD OC reported joint bleeds. See Table 1 for detailed results. Conclusion: In summary, our study showed that hemophilia carriers report significantly more bleeding by overall ISTH-BAT BS than age-matched female controls. Carriers experience both mucocutaneous bleeding as well as musculoskeletal bleeding. They score higher for mucocutaneous bleeding when compared with controls and when compared with Type 3 VWD OC. Overall Type 1 VWD patients experience more severe mucocutaneous bleeding than hemophilia carriers. However, hemophilia carriers report more musculoskeletal bleeding in the form of hemarthrosis and hematomas than all other groups. A comparison of overall ISTH-BAT BS between groups shows that bleeding in women with Type 1 VWD > hemophilia carriers > Type 3 VWD OC > controls. Additional research into the underlying pathophysiology of this abnormal bleeding is a critical next step in understanding and determining how to appropriately manage these patients. Disclosures Bidlingmaier: Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Sobi: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Biotest: Honoraria; Baxalta: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mingot-Castellano:Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chitlur:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Baxalta: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Biogen-Idec: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Fogarty:Bayer Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter/Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spark Therapeutics: Research Funding. Cuker:T2 Biosystems: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy; Biogen-Idec: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Stago: Consultancy. Mancuso:Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sobi/Biogen Idec: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kedrion: Consultancy. Holme:Baxalta, now part of Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator Clinical Studies. Mathew:Bayer: Employment. James:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy; Basalt: Consultancy; Bayer: Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».