Spokesvultures for Ecological Awareness: An Interview with Timothy Morton
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Spokesvultures for Ecological Awareness:An Interview with Timothy Morton Caitlin McIntyre (bio) and Dana Medoro (bio) Professor timothy morton, Rita Shea Guffey Chair in English at Rice University, delivered two lectures at the University of Manitoba in the winter of 2016: the first as the Sydney Warhaft Distinguished Visiting Speaker for the Faculty of Arts and the second as the keynote for the Faculty of Architecture's Atmosphere Conference. The lectures were titled, respectively, "On Ecological Touching: Knowing (as) Intimacy" and "Escape from Mesopotamia, 12,000 Years Too Late," the recordings of which are available on his blog, www.ecologywithoutnature.blogspot.com. Professor Morton is author of Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence (Columbia, 2015), Nothing: Three Inquiries into Buddhism and Critical Theory (co-authored with Marcus Boon and Eric Cazdyn, Chicago, 2015), Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Minnesota, 2013), Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality (Open Humanities, 2013), The Ecological Thought (Harvard, 2010), Ecology without Nature (Harvard, 2007), seven other books, and over one hundred and twenty essays on subjects ranging from philosophy to food politics. He is also an active scholar in the field of Object-Oriented Ontology, the ooo school inaugurated by Graham Harman, Professor of Philosophy at sci-Arc, Los Angeles. [End Page 159] During his visit to Canada, Professor Morton graciously agreed to be interviewed by Caitlin McIntyre and Dana Medoro. McIntyre and Medoro are also animal-rights activists, working to ban the use of intensive confinement systems in Canadian animal agriculture. They started reading Professor Morton's work a few years ago, initially having been thoroughly intrigued by his concept of agrilogistics: the "dark uncanniness" of the Anthropocene, as Morton defines it, through which the entire surface of Earth has been placed at the mercy of human agricultural existence, no matter how many other species die for it, no matter how crushing it becomes for fellow humans. In the interview that follows, Professor Morton discusses and expands upon many of the ideas that make their way into two of his recent books, Hyperobjects and Dark Ecology, from agrilogistics and Dasein, to gluten phobia and Marxism. The interview was conducted in person, over beer, and showcases not only Morton's philosophical reflections but also his warm, wry sense of humour. timothy morton: Agrilogistics is a violent understanding of capital-N Nature, against which the notion of human progress defines itself; domestication, agriculture, civilization—the claiming that these systems exist outside of or opposed to something called Nature. I'm not proposing we un-domesticate animals and return to a pre-Neolithic state; you can't escape civilization. It's violent to endorse that, a kind of Pol Pot ideology, in which everyone wearing glasses is now suspect, as if we can bomb ourselves back to the Stone Age. What we need to notice is that we never left the agricultural system that started twelve thousand years ago—when "human civilization" began—and we never left being animals ourselves. This is where something like gluten becomes a kind of evil! Two-thirds of Americans are gluten free and they don't understand why. It's the next magic bullet, announcing: "The evil is in the gluten. Get rid of the gluten and everything will be fine." This new phase is worse than the Atkins diet: the get-back-to-the-Paleolithic diet (and pay no attention to your heart attack). This gluten thing is more intense, though. We've all decided that everything in our life will be okay if we have no gluten—or if we can upgrade the Roundup. That is, we think we can get agrilogistics right and return to a functioning-smoothly of the world, which never existed in the first place. At its base, this is all a desire to get rid of ambiguity—to get rid of the paradox that the world is always a functioning-malfunctioning thing. Everything is broken. The lure of the idea that when things smoothly function, [End Page 160] then the dark parts disappear: this is a metaphysical trap. Because if we think things are all smoothly going along, they are only clicking in our own little anthropocentric...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».