MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2725910016

Diagnosing Fetal Alcohol Syndrome: Economic and Policy Implications

2003· dissertation· en· W2725910016 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jocelynn L. Cook

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · 2003
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFetal alcohol syndromeMedicinePolitical scienceEconomicsPregnancyBiologyGenetics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) is a range of physical and neurobehavioral disabilities that is the result of maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy.FAS and its related disabilities are significant socio-economic concerns to Canadians and is thought to be prevalent in Saskatchewan.Often, diagnosis is necessary for access to services that will improve outcome of affected individuals and their families.This thesis was designed to determine an estimate of some economic costs associated with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and its related disabilities to Saskatchewan and to determine why (and if) FAS is underdiagnosed in Saskatchewan.Economic costs to social services, justice, education, and health were estimated using provincial budgets and estimated prevalence rates of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and its related disabilities.A case-based method was also used.The economic estimates suggested that prenatal alcohol exposure is costing the province of Saskatchewan $41.1 million per year.More specifically, costs to social services, justice, education, and health were estimated to be $5.9 million, $17.6 million, $0.26 million, and $20.3 million, respectively.Based upon population estimates, the total costs ofFAS and its related disabilities to Saskatchewan may reach $XX million by the year 2021.Physicians, especially general practitioners, are often the first line of contact for FAS affected individuals and their families.Previous data suggest that physicians may not feel comfortable caring for affected individuals and their families, nor do they have the knowledge necessary to make effective and reliable FAS-related diagnoses or referrals for diagnosis.Study 2 was designed to determine the knowledge and attitudes of Saskatchewan general practitioners with respect to FAS and its related disabilities.Survey questions were based upon a survey performed in 1992.Data suggest that FAS is underdiagnosed in Saskatchewan and that general practitioners do not feel comfortable caring for affected individuals or their families.Data also suggest that Saskatchewan general practitioners do not have adequate knowledge to make effective FAS diagnoses or referrals, although some report that they have diagnosed FAS.There were no significant effects of place of practice, university appointment, or graduation year on knowledge about FAS.Finally, data suggest that, in a ten-year period, knowledge levels with respect to FAS have not increased but the number of physicians making referrals for diagnosis has increased.Together these data suggest that FAS costs Saskatchewan a significant number of dollars and that effective intervention programs may mitigate some of these costs.However, services are based upon need, and need is defined through comprehensive diagnostic assessments, but physicians need more education and training with respect to the diagnosis ofFAS and its related disabilities.2.1.2FASIFAEand the Education System 2.1.3FASIFAEand Health Systems and Services 32 2.1.4FASIFAEand Social Services 2.1.S0ther Costs 2.2 Study Objectives 34 2.3 Methods 35 2.4 Results , 36 2.4.1Justice36 2.4.2SocialServices 39 2.4.3Education40 v 2.4.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,152
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,198
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)Même sujetPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsTravaux en français237 207