Notice bibliographique
Résumé
India is the country of diversity in culture. It is very important to understand the concept of belongingness need in Indian context. Actually it is very right to say India the country of relations and belonging. India has a culture of joined family. This form of family includes a number of members of approximately three generations. This culture has its roots in belongingness. Without a sense of belongingness it would be very difficult to survive in a joined family. Although this culture is getting out of fashion in India also like foreign countries yet we can notice this type of families in Indian villages. In joined families every person is mentally as well as spiritually connected to all family members. It provides a sense of being loved and cared by other family members. All of them are aware of each other's need, success and failure. They share each other's grief and happiness. This; undoubtedly helps enriched them with a higher self-esteem and wellbeing. It has been proved by the studies that a better sense of belongingness provides a better sense of subjective well-being. A strong sense of belonging to a group is a key element for the harmony of a country.Sense of belonging to one's local community is a measure of the degree of connection that individuals have built up within their neighborhood or community. This may be achieved through membership in local organizations or through helping others out when needed. A survey was done by CCHS among the various health service delivery areas. The result showed stronger sense of belonging among teens or youth ( 12- to 19-year-olds) and seniors (65 and over) when compared to the middle age cohort (20 to64 years). This difference was significant statistically. Fraser East teens had a higher sense of belonging to their community than other teens around the province, and this sense of belonging was also statistically significantly higher than the 20 to 64 age group in their region. Kootenay Boundary seniors had a significantly greater sense of belonging to their community than other seniors in the province.Newman, Lehman, and Newman (2007) found that adolescent girls have been found to value group membership more and are more identified with their peer groups than boys. Adolescent girls tend to have a higher number of friends than boys. They expect and desire more nurturing behavior from their friends. Girls experience more self-disclosure, more empathy, and less overt hostility compared to boys. It has been found that girls use ruminative coping which involves perseverating on the negative feelings and the unpleasant situations associated with problems. Boys on the other hand, tend to be less intimate and have more activity based friendships. Boys do not benefit as much as girls from feelings of belonging that are a product of enduring and close friendships. They are less vulnerable to the emotional distress that is likely to accompany high levels of co-rumination and disclosure.There is no clear indication about the pattern of belongings among various groups of people. Some results show that adolescent girls show more belongingness in comparison to adolescent boys. They are more caring and self-reveling than boys.A survey by Employment and social development Canada was done in 2003 to point out the sense of belongingness among the Canadians. The results showed that, 88% of Canadians expressed a 'somewhat or very strong' sense of belonging to Canada, followed by 81% having this sense of belonging to their province, and 70% reporting this sense of belonging to their community.Men and women reported similar levels of belonging. In 2003, a slightly higher percentage of women than men (2 to 3 percentage points more) expressed a 'somewhat or very strong' sense of belonging to Canada, their province, and their community.For all age groups in 2003, the sense of belonging to Canada was highest, followed by province, and community. However, the sense of belonging increased with age. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».