MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2726808574 · doi:10.1177/073953290202300110

<i>NRJ</i> Book: Ralph Emerson McGill: Voice of the Southern Conscience

2002· article· en· W2726808574 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick S. Washburn

Notice bibliographique

RevueNewspaper Research Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConscienceHistoryArtMedia studiesPolitical scienceSociologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ralph Emerson McGill: Voice of Southern Conscience By Leonard Ray Teel (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 2001), 559 pages Reviewed by Patrick S. Washburn In July 1966, managing editor of Atlanta Journal took seven of us who had recently joined news editorial staff to meet Ralph McGill, publisher of Atlanta newspapers. We saw him for about ten minutes. After we briefly introduced ourselves, he welcomed us to paper and we left. For remainder of my year at Journal, I never saw McGill again and thought little about meeting. But as years wore on and I occasionally ran across his name as one of Southern journalists who had led way in ending segregation, I slowly began to appreciate significance of what had occurred. We had met of whom Atlanta papers were so proud. Now, that man comes alive in a book by Leonard Ray Teel, a former reporter at Atlanta Constitution and now an associate professor of communications at Georgia State University. Based on 14 years of extensive research in primary documents and numerous interviews, he has produced a splendid book that will satisfy both academic historians, who demand rigor, and non-academics, who like lively biographies. It also should be required reading for all newspaper editorial and column writers. Woven throughout book are numerous insights by McGill into what it takes to succeed in demanding grind of continually turning out a daily column as well as crafting editorials that make a difference in society. As Teel notes, McGill's life did not begin auspiciously. Shortly before he was to graduate from Vanderbilt, he wrote a column in weekly student newspaper that wondered why a student lounge had not been built, even though funds had been given for it. Had money been embezzled? The chancellor did not like column, and McGill was suspended. Then, he got into further trouble with a prank when he invited prostitutes to a dance at a rival fraternity. As a result, he never graduated, although later he would receive honorary doctorates. Meanwhile, he already was working at Nashville Banner as a sportswriter, and in 1929 he went to Atlanta Constitution. Over next forty years, although McGill never lost his love of sports, he left sports behind as he became enthralled with politics and dream of what Atlanta could be in newly developing South. A hard-drinking workaholic who continually read three books a week, he sought fame in his column writing, sometimes worrying that it would never come. But it did as he quickly became known as a great storyteller as well as someone who gently led his readers, whether they liked it or not. He was not always gentle in his writing, particularly with short-sighted politicians. As he put it succintly to a friend, Sometimes, you have to step out in center of ring and hit them in nose. What makes Teel's book fascinating is that it slowly takes reader on McGill's journey through segregation period. The reader can see McGill's views changing over years. As implausible as it may seem, he originally was against an anti-lynching law and supported poll taxes. And, at first, he did not speak out against segregation, which in polite Southern society was known simply as the situation. That was way it was. One did not discuss it. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,059
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,175

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0060,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0520,026

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,078
Tête enseignante GPT0,293
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNewspaper Research JournalMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207