Beauty is in the brain size of the beholder

Poop is all the rage these days. It isn't some new weird trend championed by hipster youth, but rather the enthusiasm of scientists who study our microbiomes, the bacteria that live on and within us. These bacteria, which are often best characterized by studying our poop (hence the rage), provide endless benefits to our health and well-being. They influence metabolism, development, immunity, behavior and much else. But when these beneficial microbes are eliminated by antibiotics, which are crucial life-savers against bacterial pathogens, things can go horribly awry. Most notably, treatment can cause dysbiosis, a microbial imbalance in our guts that increases our susceptibility to opportunistic bacteria like Clostridium difficile. But dysbiosis isn't just a human phenomenon. As elegantly shown in a new paper in PLoS Biology by Kasie Raymann and her colleagues from the University of Texas, what's true for humans is also true for bees.Bees are in global decline and one of the reasons for their troubles is a disease called American foulbrood, caused by the bacterial pathogen Paenibacillus larvae. Bee keepers can treat foulbrood by feeding bees or spraying hives with the broad-spectrum antibiotic oxytetracycline, which is effective against P. larvae. However, Raymann and her team wondered whether these drugs could also have off-target effects on the normal microbiota of bees and, if so, would the resulting dysbiosis harm bees just like it does humans?To test this, the team fed bees with oxytetracycline and compared their microbiomes with those of bees fed the same diet without the drug. As expected, antibiotic treatment had a dramatic effect on the core bacterial species of the bee microbiome. Bacterial abundance in oxytetracycline-treated bee guts declined nearly 5-fold as did overall bacterial diversity. However, it wasn't only core bacteria that declined; so too did bee health. Roughly two-thirds of the treated bees died; around twice the mortality of control bees. But why did the treated bees die?The cause, it turns out, is highly reminiscent of the factors leading to opportunistic C. difficile infections in humans: dysbiosis. So, oxytetracycline caused the ‘good’ bacteria of the bee microbiome to decline and in so doing created a vacuum that allowed other species to thrive, including a well-known insect pathogen called Serratia. And when the team fed antibiotic-treated larvae with Serratia, these bees died too, providing unambiguous evidence that antibiotic-induced dysbiosis increased bee susceptibility to off-target opportunistic pathogens. More importantly, the results confirmed that the core microbiome is a barrier to disease under normal conditions.Sometimes in medicine, the treatment is worse than the disease itself. This is unlikely to be the case here, as the benefits of foulbrood eradication almost certainly exceed the costs of Serratia-induced mortality. However, this study nicely demonstrates the unanticipated dangers of perturbing the microbiome. In addition, it perhaps suggests a solution to bee dysbiosis. One of the most promising treatments for C. difficile infections is to repopulate the human gut with a so-called fecal transplant. This provides an apparent barrier to C. difficile disease and works markedly better than antibiotics. Although I don't envy the bee proctologist administering microbiome enemas to larval bees, perhaps this type of fecal replacement (‘bee-cal’ transplants) is just what the hive ordered? Such an approach would avoid the dysbiosis that increases the risks of Serratia and other pathogens, while maintaining the treatment benefits against foulbrood. Novel solutions are needed to arrest global bee declines. Microbiome manipulation seems a worthwhile place to look.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.