MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2728047044 · doi:10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000911

Canadian society of Plastics urgeons société canadienne des chirurgiens Plasticiens

2015· article· fr· W2728047044 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edward E. Tredget, Howard M. Clarke, Chris Taylor

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlastic Surgery · 2015
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHistory of Medical Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Learning Objectives: 1. Participants will recognize advantages and disadvantages of flap reconstruction of pelvic and perineal defects following abdominal perineal resection or pelvic exenteration.2. Participants will identify strategies to reconstruct the pelvic, perineal and vaginal structures using flaps from various donor sites.3. Participants will understand the advantages and disadvantages of thigh-based and abdominal-based flaps for pelvic/perineal reconstruction. 01aUtologoUs Bone cranioPlastY safetY and efficacY: a review of 128 cases over 39 Years n nathan, ir Macarthur, r Burke, sa wolfe Miami, florida, Usa PURPOSE: Many cranioplasties in North America are performed with alloplastic implants because of ease of the procedure and a lack of experience related to bone harvest.Published series of alloplastic repairs have reported infection rates of 9 to 23%.The senior author has used autogenous bone of various sources for 128 calvarial defects over a 39-year period and this report will present that experience.METHODS: A total of 134 cases met inclusion criteria (several patients had staged reconstructions).Data regarding patient demographics, underlying pathology, complications, and length of follow-up were collected.RESULTS: Average patient age was 22, with a range of 12 months to 76 years.Causes of the cranial defects included trauma, malignancy, infection, craniosynostosis, and surgically created defects resulting from full-thickness calvarial harvest.Donor sites included calvarium (72%), rib (22%) and ilium (10 %).Eleven patients had had prior failures with alloplastic materials.Notably, there were no cases of infection, no cases requiring bone graft removal, and no significant graft resorption on follow-up.Furthermore, no complications were seen related to harvesting of the autogenous grafts.CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study demonstrates that autogenous bone is the ideal graft replacement for full-thickness, cranial vault defects.Absolute indications for the use of autogenous bone include defects near the paranasal sinuses, defects in growing children, previous alloplastic failures, and complex orbito-cranial defects requiring staged procedures.More emphasis should be placed on teaching plastic surgery residents how to harvest and work with bone so that alloplastic materials will not be their only recourse. Learning Objectives:Participants will learn the advantages of using autologous bone in cranioplasty surgery. fUnctional oUtcoMes of enoPHtHalMos correctionM Mcrae, a Budning, c lynham, o antonyshyn toronto, on PURPOSE: Determine functional outcomes of late post-traumatic enophthalmos repair, specifically, ocular motility, diplopia, and strabismus.METHODS: The study series comprises 81 consecutive patients with late post-traumatic enophthalmos with functional impairment, that underwent enophthalmos repair by a single surgeon (OA) between May 2002 and April 2014.Of those, 39 patients fulfilled study inclusion and exclusion criteria.Outcomes (diplopia, limitations of ocular motility, and strabismus) were assessed independently by a single ophthalmologist who specializes in strabismus surgery (AB), and were performed preop and postop for each patient.RESULTS: Average age was 43.1 (range 15-79) with 26 males, and 13 females.After enopthalmos correction 20 patients decreased by 1 or more grades of diplopia, while 7 patients had complete resolution.Re-operation was required in 6 patients to address inadequate correction or post-operative complication.Two patients worsened by 1 or more grades of diplopia after enophthalmos repair.Residual diplopia was treated with strabismus surgery in 10 patients.4 patients were managed with prism glasses without further surgery.Of the 10 patients that received strabismus surgery, 6 patients improved by 1 or more grades of diplopia, 2 worsened.34 of 39 patients presented with vertical restriction μ=-1.95(σ=1.13) was improved to μ=-1.21 (σ=0.98) with enopthalmos repair and to μ=-1.06 (σ=0.98) after all interventions.18 patients presented with horizontal restriction μ=-0.88 (σ=0.62).This improved to μ=-0.56 (σ=0.6) after enopthalmos repair and μ=0.59 (σ=0.6) after all interventions.CONCLUSIONS: Late enopthalmos repair post orbital fracture resulted in functional improvement of diplopia, ocular restriction and strabismus in this retrospective case series.Learning Objectives: 1. Understand the functional sequelae of post-traumatic enopthalmos 2. Appreciate of the benefits and limitations of enopthalmos repair to address functional outcomes of diplopia, ocular motility, and strabismus 03 airwaY ManageMent in Pierre roBin seqUence: tHe vancoUver classification sYsteM wY li, a Poon, d courtemanche, c verchere, c Malic, J arneja vancouver, Bc PURPOSE: Neonates with Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) present with airway obstruction and feeding difficulties.No current practical classification of PRS patients exists.We hereby propose a clinical classification and treatment algorithm.METHOD: A 10-year retrospective study of all neonates diagnosed with PRS was performed.Patients with glossoptosis, retrognathia, airway obstruction ± cleft palate were included.We collected data on demographics, treatment and outcomes during the first year of life.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,122
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,170
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,122
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,060
Tête enseignante GPT0,272
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePlastic SurgeryMême sujetHistory of Medical PracticeTravaux en français237 207