Anticoagulation Prophylaxis in Asparaginase-Based Therapy in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in adults receiving asparaginase (ASNase) based intensification chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We previously reported a high VTE rate in patients receiving a modified Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) intensification phase, which included weekly ASNase. We report thrombosis rates during induction and the results using two different dosing schedules of enoxaparin as primary VTE prophylaxis in adults treated with the same protocol. Methods: We reviewed pts who received induction chemotherapy, without VTE prophylaxis, using DFCI protocol (containing one dose of ASNase) between 2012-2016. Pts achieving complete remission (CR) subsequently received weekly ASNase-based modified DFCI intensification phase for at least 7 cycles (21 weeks) with VTE prophylaxis, using two dosing schedules in consecutive cohorts: A. Low-dose group received enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously (SC) daily for patients weighing < 80 kg and 60 mg daily for those ≥ 80 kg; B. Dose-escalated group received enoxaparin 1 mg/kg SC daily (rounded to the nearest 20 mg). VTE rates were calculated for pts during induction and intensification phase (low-dose and escalated dose prophylaxis). Results were compared to a similar group of 99 pts previously treated with the same DFCI protocol who did not receive VTE prophylaxis during intensification. Patients not achieving CR, relapsing, undergoing alloSCT after induction, not completing at least 21 weeks of intensification phase or developing VTE before induction were not included. Results: The VTE rate during induction (n-=144) was 2.8%. Of 111 pts who received intensification prophylaxis, the overall VTE rate was 19.8% (p<0.001 compared to induction). Of 41 patients who received low-dose prophylaxis, the VTE rate was 26.8%, while the VTE rate in the dose-escalated prophylaxis group was 15.7%. This compared to a 27.3% rate in the historical non-prophylaxis group (Table 1). There was no significant difference among intensification groups (no prophylaxis, low-dose, and dose-escalated) with respect to median age, gender, weight and number of treatment cycles. The actual mean dose of enoxaparin in the low-dose prophylaxis group was 0.62 mg/kg, as compared to 0.90 mg/kg in the dose-escalated group. There were no major bleeding complications observed in the prophylaxis groups. The minor bleeding rate in the entire prophylaxis cohort was 4.5% (5/111), and was similar between the low-dose and escalated dose groups. Sites of VTE in the prophylaxis groups included lower extremity (11 cases), sagittal sinus (3), subclavian line related (5), pulmonary embolism (9), and cardiac thrombus (1); some patients had more than one site involved. Conclusions: Our data confirmed a high VTE rate during intensification, even with prophylaxis. Dose-escalation of enoxaparin to 1 mg/kg was safe with a trend toward reduction in VTE rates, particularly in patients weighing > 80 kg; however, a larger cohort would be needed to determine if this difference is significant. The use of novel anticoagulants in this setting could be considered. Disclosures Schuh: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gupta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schimmer:Novartis: Honoraria.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».