Towards a Biography of Lucy Broadwood (1858-1929): Problems and Perspectives
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The 41st World Congress of the International Council for Traditional Music was held at Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, from Wednesday July 13th to Thursday July 19th, 2011. Apart from attending many of the great variety of paper sessions, workshops and concerts, I participated actively in this conference in two main ways: \n \n1. On Sunday July 17th, at 1030am, I chaired a ninety-minute workshop titled “Singing the West: Traditional Songs and Songs in the Tradition from the Prairies and British Columbia.” This focused mainly, although not entirely, on the homesteading, logging, mining, and fishing songs in the Philip Thomas Collection. I introduced the Thomas Collection and the individual songs chosen from it, placing them in their historical and geographical contexts. The other participants in the workshop, as singers, were Rosaleen Gregory and Calgary musician John Leeder, the Honorary President of the Canadian Society for Tradiitonal Music. There was an audience of about one dozen, and there were lively discussions both during and after the song presentations. It appeared to be a very successful session. \n \n2. On Monday July 18th, at 3.30pm, I participated in a two-hour paper session titled “Pioneering Individuals and the Construction of Musical Narratives.” As part of this session I duly delivered my paper on “Towards a Biography of Lucy Broadwood (1858-1929): Problems and Perspectives.” I accompanied the paper with a power-point presentation designed to highlight the structure of the paper and to provide visual images of Broadwood and several of her composer, musician and intellectual friends, including Ralph Vaughan Williams, Percy Grainger, Fanny Davies and Jessie Weston. \nThe paper was well-received, but there was time for only about five minutes of discussion. This focused mainly on Broadwood’s complicated relationship to Cecil Sharp. I was asked why I called Sharp an acquaintance of Broadwood rather than a friend since they worked closely together on a few issues of the Journal of the Folksong Society. I tried to explain the class differences between the two collectors, and the somewhat exclusive nature of Broadwood’s social networks which included many people of whom Sharp had made enemies by criticizing them publicly. However, in retrospect I think that my explanation identified only part of the truth. Personality conflicts and ideological differences about the nature of English folksong also undoubtedly played a role in keeping their relationship rather distant. Given Sharp’s central role in the English Folksong Revival this is clearly an important issue that will require exploration in some depth in my anticipated book on Broadwood. It was useful to be alerted to it. More generally, the main purpose of my writing and delivering this paper was to help me clarify some of the principal themes and issues to be addressed in that book. I believe it served that purpose admirably and was therefore a valuable and worth-while experience. I was also glad to meet Elaine Keillor (a participant in the same session) and to learn about the Tom Kines archive of which she is curator.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».