Recombinant Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) Mediated Activation of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (PCCs). Studies on the Comparison of Novoseven with a Biosimilar Product
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction Recombinant factor VIIa (NovoSeven® Copenhagen, Denmark) is used in the management of bleeding in patients with hemophilia. A generic biosimilar version of NovoSeven® is also developed for same indication (AryoSeven™, AryoGen, Tehran-Iran). The two products exhibit comparable compositional and biochemical profile. To compare the activation profile of NovoSeven® and AryoSeven™, two commercially available protein complex concentrates (PCCs) were used. The activation profiles were studied utilizing SDS- gel electrophoresis profile and immunoblotting using anti-rabbit recombinant thrombin antibody. Materials & Methods NovoSeven®, AryoSeven™, Profilnine® SD (Grifols Biologicals Inc. USA), and Beriplex® (CSL Behring Canada, Inc.) were obtained commercially. Recombinant human thrombin antibodies were generated in rabbits. Recothrom® was commercially obtained (Zymogenetic, Seatle,Wa- USA and Medicine Company ,Parsippany, NJ –USA). Tissue factor RecombiPlasTin 2G was obtained from Instrumentation Laboratory Company (Bedford- USA). NovoSeven® and AryoSeven™ were diluted with saline to make working solution of 1mg/ml. Further dilutions were made with saline to obtain 0.5 µg/ml, 1.25µg/ml, and 2.5µg/ml rFVIIa preparations. To make working solution of PCCs, PCCs were diluted to 10 U/ml in saline. The sample mixtures contain 2U/ml PCCs, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 µg/ml rFVIIa, and with RecombiPlasTin 2G at 1:5 ratio. The samples mixtures incubated in 5, 15, and 30 minutes at 37°c. SDS-PAGE (Pierce Biotechnology) and immunoblotting carried against Recothrom®. Results Profilnine® SD activated by RecombiPlasTin 2G resulted in conversions of prothrombin to prethrombin and thrombin at 5 to 30 minutes incubation time as evident by the generation of distinct bands at 50kDa and 36 kDa. However, addition of rFVIIa at final concentration range of 0.25 and 0.5µg/ml to the same mixture resulted in total conversion of prothrombin to thrombin at 30 minutes with a doublet bands at 36 kDa. Recombinant FVIIa alone failed to generate thrombin in native Profilnine® SD at 5 to 30 minutes as evident by the absence of 36 kDa band in the SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting studies. Further studies comparing NovoSeven® and AryoSeven™ (FC: 0.1µg/ml) in the activated Profilnine® SD resulted in a comparable and progressive generation of thrombin at 5 and 15 minutes incubation time. At 5 and 15 minutes residual prethrombin bands were noted which was less intense at 15 minute incubation time in both rFVIIa preparations. Although rFVIIa alone unable to generate thrombin in native Beriplex®, the presence of rFVIIa in activated Beriplex did not change the activation profile. Activated Beriplex® by RecombiPlasTin 2G resulted in complete conversion of prothrombin to thrombin at 30 minutes incubation time. A complete generation of thrombin was noted in both activated PCCs in the presence of rFVIIa at final concentrations of 0.25µg/ml and 0.5µg/ml. At 5 minutes residual prothrombin and prethrombin bands were noted in the presence of rFVIIa at final concentration of 0.1µg/ml. However, at 15 minutes prothrombin bands were completely disappeared and prethrombin bands were less intense at same concentration of 0.1µg/ml of rFVIIa. The results obtained by Western blot analysis confirmed the differential activation of Profilnine® SD and Beriplex®. However, both the NovoSeven® and AryoSeven™ exhibited similar activation profiles. Conclusions These results indicate that the activation of PCCs by both AryoSeven™ and NovoSeven® result in comparable generation of thrombin. Furthermore, while both rFVIIa produced similar activation profile, PCCs based differences in the activation profile were noted. These studies provide an in vitro profiling of the effects of activated FVIIa on the generation of thrombin and related enzymes to demonstrate biosimilarity of the branded and generic versions of these haemostatic products. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».