Social support and employee job satisfaction : what does the public service employee survey tell us?
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Projects managers, along with any other person having to supervise personnel, must display basic humanistic behavioral competencies (i.e. actions) in order to contribute to employee job satisfaction. Among these competencies, the ability to give support to team members is considers as paramount. However, both employee job satisfaction and supervisory behavior are multi-faceted constructs which still have to be studied and refined further in the public service, especially with regards to their relationship to one another. Therefore, the aim of this thesis is to further our comprehension of these constructs and of their interrelations. Raw data, gathered by Statistics Canada in 1999, 2002, and 2005 through the PSES (Public Service Employee Survey), which deals with the qualities of work environment will be used here. One of the limits of the PSES that needs to be addressed is the absence of a supporting theoretical model. A careful examination of the items and preliminary factorial analyses show that Karasek's Job Demand-Control-Support JDC(S) model offers a conceptual framework which is highly compatible with the PSES. It will therefore be used here both to generate research questions and to interpret the results. The research questions are as follows : 1) What is the factor structure of the PSES and is it stable across cohorts? ) Are items dealing with supervisory and peer support included in one broad social support factor or are they separate factorial entities? 3) Does the perception of supervisory and peer support evolve from T1 to T3 (i.e. 1999 - 2002 - 2005)? 4) Among all the factors generated through factorial analysis of the Public Service Employee Survey, is social support the most strongly related to employee job satisfaction? The three samples taking part in the study represent at least 55% of all federal Public Service employees, with corresponding data sets, including each time more than 100 000 participants.Results indicated that : -A sturdy four-factor solution, conceptually named opportunities, social support, standards and employee job satisfaction exists across the two last survey years (i.e. 2002 and 2005). -Supervisory and peer support are clearly separate and distinct entities and not part of one broad social support factor. - There has been a decrease in employees' perception of supervisory and peer support from a highpoint in 1999. - There is a clear link between job satisfaction and social support in the Public Service of Canada (PSC). Additionally, the employee job satisfaction scale can be split into two conceptually different subscales named stressors and job quality using the items negative and positive loadings, respectively. Implications of these findings are discussed in terms of their applicability in the public service of Canada workforce.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle