MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2735078344 · doi:10.1097/01.cot.0000521885.70331.34

Less Chemotherapy Recommended After Surgery for Low-Risk Colon Cancer

2017· article· en· W2735078344 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark L. Fuerst

Notice bibliographique

RevueOncology Times · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineOxaliplatinFOLFOXCapecitabineColorectal cancerDiscontinuationInternal medicineChemotherapySurgeryOncologyCancer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

colon cancer: colon cancerCHICAGO—After surgery for lymph-node positive colon cancer, patients with a low risk of recurrence should receive half of the now-recommended standard course of chemotherapy. The current standard of care for stage III colon cancer is 6 months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy with FOLFOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin), which is also known as XELOX. However, “oxaliplatin is associated with cumulative dose-dependent neurotoxicity that is debilitating for many patients, both short-term and long-term. Nerve damage, including numbness, tingling, and pain, can persist long after discontinuation of therapy, sometimes permanently. Shorter duration treatment without loss of efficacy would be of benefit to patients and health care resources,” said senior author Axel Grothey, MD, an oncologist at the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center in Rochester, Minn., at a press briefing at the 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting, held June 2-6. Grothey presented data from the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant therapy (IDEA) international collaboration of six clinical trials with more than 12,800 patients. He revealed that 3 months of chemotherapy was nearly as effective as 6 months in patients with relatively lower recurrence risk and caused fewer side effects, particularly nerve damage (Abstract LBA1). IDEA Data Studied Based on pre-planned analysis of pooled data from these prospective, phase III clinical trials conducted in 12 countries, a shorter, 3-month course of chemotherapy was associated with a less than 1 percent lower chance of achieving disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years (74.6%) compared to the standard 6-month course (75.5%). In a subset of patients considered at low risk of cancer recurrence, defined as cancer spread to 1 to 3 lymph nodes and not completely through the bowel wall, the difference was even smaller—83.1 percent in patients receiving a 3-month course and 83.3 percent in those receiving a 6-month course. Patients were followed for a median time of 39 months. The type of chemotherapy regimen selected affected the difference in 3-year DFS between the 3-month and 6-month treatment duration (75.9% vs. 74.8% with CAPOX and 73.6% vs. 76.0% with FOLFOX), although the difference was relatively small. “Our findings could apply to about 400,000 colon cancer patients worldwide every year. For 60 percent of these patients, who have lower risk for cancer recurrence, 3 months of chemotherapy will likely become the new standard of care,” said Grothey. He noted that patients with higher risk colon cancer should discuss with their doctor whether they are candidates for a shorter course of therapy, taking into consideration their preference, age, and ability to tolerate chemotherapy. “How much are we willing to push patients into 6 months of therapy for little difference in efficacy?” he asked. The rate of clinically meaningful (grade 2 or higher) nerve damage was substantially less common in patients receiving a 3-month course of chemotherapy (15% with FOLFOX, 17% with CAPOX) compared to a 6-month course (45% with FOLFOX, 48% with CAPOX). He noted that no dose reductions and early discontinuation due to neurotoxicity are common. Aside from nerve damage, longer chemotherapy also means more diarrhea and fatigue, more doctor appointments, blood draws, and time away from work and social interactions, said Grothey. “For patients with a low risk of recurrence, 3 months of chemotherapy is effective with no compromise in potency, reduced effectiveness, or increased toxicity.” The IDEA data provide a framework for discussions on risks and benefits of individualized adjuvant therapy approaches. “Shorter duration of therapy is associated with remarkable reduction in neurotoxicity,” said Grothey. “For low-risk cancers, 3 months duration of oxaliplatin-based therapy is adequate. This applies to about 20,000 patients per year in the U.S. These results should have an immediate impact on care.” He noted that 3 months of CAPOX is adequate, whereas a longer duration of FOLFOX might be required. Grothey added that there was no commercial funding for IDEA, with individual studies supported by public funds and philanthropy. ASCO Commentary ASCO Expert Nancy Baxter, MD, PhD, Chief of the General Surgery Department at St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Canada, commented: “This is practice-changing work that shows for most people with stage III colon cancer 3 months of treatment provides all the benefits of 6 months of treatment with fewer risks. Less is more. “We are now able to spare many patients with colon cancer unnecessary side effects of an additional 3 months of chemotherapy without compromising results. This study is an excellent example of how existing treatments can be refined to work even better for patients.” She added: “Although addressing the question, ‘Can we give less treatment?’ is of major importance to patients and their doctors, it is rare to see this type of study. Given that these questions are unlikely to be of interest to the pharmaceutical industry, federal support for these trials is critical. The pharmaceutical industry is not interested in giving less treatment. This study is a great example of how NIH funding can have a major and immediate impact on the lives of cancer patients.” Richard Schilsky, MD, Chief Medical Officer of ASCO, commented: “This is another step on the road toward personalized cancer treatment based on risk assessment. Not everyone needs adjuvant chemotherapy. Starting next week, colon cancer patients will be prescribed shorter courses of chemotherapy.” Mark L. Fuerst is a contributing writer.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,345
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,400
Écart entre enseignants0,353 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOncology TimesMême sujetCancer Treatment and PharmacologyTravaux en français237 207