Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We were at a dinner party recently and the person across the table discovered our connection to education and music.The next bit of conversation was predictable (as is the opening of most music education articles these days)!"Have you seen Mr. Holland's Opus?" "Yes," we answered, "on opening night!" "So, what did you think of it?"What we think is that it raises some important questions such as what is important in music class, who controls the content of instruction, what makes music instruction worthwhile, and how can we contribute to the survival of music in the schools.We will try to explore here what we think is at least one of the central questions: what is the role, importance, and quality of the relationship that engages the learner with music.Consider the following reflections on music learning experiences.Are there aspects of these experiences that resonate with yours?Do you contribute to these sorts of experiences with your students?...the people that turned me off to music because of the subtle personal abuse and the relentless focus on performance and not play!If only I could have had the opportunity to explore what music could do for me instead of always having to play someone else's music someone else's way --I had no ownership.I was immersed in music but not with the variety that would have captured me.I did not have good demonstrations of music-making that inspired or encouraged --not even enchanted me --and never that instructed me --just words and criticisms that were punctuated by impatience.No one worked within my zone of proximal development.No one worked with any understanding of who I am.Engagement was not there, nor "use" in Cambourne's sense as practice ("learners need time and opportunity to use, employ, and practise their developing control in functional, realistic, nonartificial ways" Cambourne 1988, p.33) Oh, but there was practice!.... terrible experiences of practice --at home on the piano or my singing --but school!! Terrible instruments that tasted like rusty spit and smelled...and would not stop squeaking and squawking because they were in such bad shape and no one was there beside me to care appropriately.The music that emerged both individually and collectively was nasty and provoked my sensitively tuned ears.I knew it was terrible and felt hopeless to do anything about it.And, I couldn't have the instrument I wanted --none of them.I had to play the E flat alto sax...I wanted the drums or the flute or, best of all, the vibes or a harp!...but a sax....If I had been able to be in a situation that met the conditions that Cambourne and Max van Manen suggest, I might be a satisfied `functional' musician or at least an informed audience participant.It is one of the most disappointing aspects of my education.One of my ways of knowing was squelched by miseducative experiences.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,030 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,028 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».